Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL,CHECKLIST <br /> 4.14 RECREATION <br /> Less Than <br /> y}a Potential SPniEIR`. >SlidificMt <br /> Significant Requires, Impact bae New New <br /> Impact ' Additional `to l►4itigatlon Additional" Additional <br /> I Less Than Adequately Review.No Measures in, .Impact"Not Mitigation <br /> Significant Addressedjn Significant Project Addressed in Measures <br /> Issue or No Impact SPIIIEIR Impact Description SPIIIEIR Required <br /> 14. RECREATION: ' , <br /> a) Would the project increase the use, a , <br /> of existing neigh.borhood-and ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> regional parks or other recreational ` <br /> facilities such that substantial <br /> physical deterioration of the facility <br /> would occur or be accelerated? <br /> b) Does the project include recreational - . ■ ❑ <br /> s facilities or require the construction , <br /> or expansion of recreational M <br /> facilities which might have an <br /> adverse physical effect ori the , <br /> environment? <br /> SETTING , <br /> The Mountain House Community Services District(MHCSD) is responsible for.securing <br /> funding,developing, and operating regional,community, and neighborhood parks in the <br /> Mountain House Community in compliance with the MHMP(San Joaquin County;1994). <br /> At present, MHCSD operates one 5-acre park located at the corner of Wicklund Crossing and <br /> Historic Street in Neighborhood F. A second 5-acre park in Neighborhood E will be <br /> completed within the next two years (Machado Checklist, 2006). <br /> The closest regional recreational facility to the project area is the Bethany Reservoir Park in <br /> Alameda County west of the Mountain House Community. The closestregional park in San <br /> Joaquin County Is the Durham Ferry State Recreation Area along the San Joaquin River east <br /> of Tracy.. Larch Clover County Park is located in Tracy(EDAW, 2005b). <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> I <br /> One potential impact regarding additional demand for public parkland was identified in the <br /> 2005 SPIIIEIR. This impact was found to be less than significant. <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the potential impact was found to be less than significant, there are no related <br /> mitigation measures identified in the 2005 SPIIIEIR. <br /> 4-69 <br />