Laserfiche WebLink
SSS§ 6.3. On May 16, 2007, the two perc test borings were drilled in the referenced locations. The <br /> sidewalls of each boring were scored with a pry-bar to open potentially smeared sidewails. Two <br /> inches of fine gravel was placed at the bottom and three-inch perforated PVC pipe was inserted in <br /> each test boring. On May 17, 2007, each boring was pre-saturated with water at 3x each bore hole <br /> volume at 0900 hrs, 24 hrs before the start of testing. This pre-saturation exceeds EHD Standards. <br /> i <br /> SSS§ 6.4Z, 6.5. On May 17, 2007,percolation testing commend :-No st ding water was observed <br /> after the 24-hr soak period in either of the two test borings. Contequent , EHD Pere Test Procedure <br /> #2 was conducted in which testing was done over a four-hour peri o induce maximum soil <br /> saturation. <br /> The test results indicate equal perc rates between the 24 inch and 40 incherc test depths, rl 9.2 <br /> p p <br /> minutes per inch (min/in). A summary of the perc test results with corresponding applicati n rat in <br /> gallons of effluent accepted per square foot of soil,per day are found in Table 2: <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> PER_COI,ATIONTEST RESULTS 70 AREAWITH °y <br /> ' RRN� <br /> ESPONDING PP (GAL <br /> COI�ETIDAY .< <br />� Q:�� <br /> 24 INCH DEEP PERC TEST BORING inch 1 0.671 gallonslft2/day <br /> PERCOLATION RATE 1 APPLICATION RATE <br /> 40 INCH DEEP PERC TEST BORING 19.2 inch 1 0.671 gallons/ft/day <br /> PERCOLATION RATE/APPLICATION RATE <br /> Application Rate adapted from California State Water Resources Control Board Guidelines for Design o emge Systems and is based on the Perc Rate. <br /> D. GROUNDWATER INFORMATION <br /> NLS§ 2.1, SSS§ 4.1'. g q Groundwater depths and elevations throu hout San Joa uin CountY<are <br /> illustrated on maps published by the County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. <br /> However, due to the high degree of variability in groundwater elevations in the Tracy area, <br /> groundwater lines of equal depth and equal elevation are not drawn for this area. The last map <br /> denoting lines of equal elevation for the Tracy area was published in 1992, and show the general <br /> groundwater flow to be in a northeasterly direction, toward the San Joaquin River. This is <br /> regarded as the generalized groundwater directional flow,based on highly accurate groundwater <br /> studies at the Tracy Defense Depot. <br /> Well logs were found in EHD files for surrounding domestic wells, so well construction details and <br /> underlying lithology could be determined. Subsurface lithology illustrate intervening strata of <br /> sand and clay. <br /> NLS§ 2.2, 3.1, SSS2. ,4.2. Since surrounding properties have been intensely farmed for several <br /> decades, the potentia or nitrate contamination in the underlying groundwater is y <br /> significant. This was d o stra d with the nitrate test results for the water to e (71 ppm) nd for,/ <br /> the on-site domestic w 11 (5$ ppm) <br /> 5 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />