Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS K AND L INITIAL STUDY 5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 16.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br /> L� <br /> i <br /> As discussed in the SPII Initial Study,the wastewater treatment plant(WWTP) <br /> will need to be expanded before it can serve all of SPI and SPIT. The SPII Initial <br /> Study noted, however,that a substantial portion of SPIT development can pro- <br /> ceed before the WWTP must be expanded. The WWTP must also be designed <br /> to accommodate peak wet-weather flows that include infiltration and inflow <br /> caused by rainfall. The MHCSD must issue a"will serve" letter indicating that <br /> sufficient capacity will be available for each neighborhood before each <br /> neighborhood Tentative Subdivision Map is approved. The Neighborhoods K <br /> and L applicant, Shea Mountain House, LLC,would contribute its fair share of <br /> the cost to build additional WWTP capacity. Environmental impacts of full <br /> buildout of the WWTP, including construction impacts,were evaluated in a <br /> separate Initial Study(SJCCDD, 1998). As noted in the Setting section above, <br /> rf the WWTP was expanded and improved to provide treatment for 3.0-mgd <br /> average dry weather flow. The expansion is likely to be adequate to serve <br /> development proposed for Neighborhoods K and L should this occur prior to <br /> development of Neighborhoods I and J. <br /> `—' Demand for Wastewater Service. As already noted,the currently proposed <br /> development would allow a similar number of dwelling units as that identified in <br /> SPII, and only about 190 more jobs than projected under SPIT. The proposal <br /> P� would not create substantial new demand for wastewater service beyond that <br /> i evaluated in the SPII Initial Study. Planned land uses for Neighborhoods K and <br /> L would generate an estimated 740,000 gallons per day(gpd)of wastewater. <br /> tk <br /> Conclusion. The above discussion reveals that construction of new water or <br /> wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities would not cause <br /> potential significant impacts that were not adequately addressed in the 1994 <br /> —' MEIR or the SPII Initial Study. <br /> r <br /> c) Would the project require or result in the construction of new storm wafer <br /> 4 drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of <br /> which could cause significant environmental effects? <br /> Construction of new storm drains with catch basins(a.k.a. drop inlets)would be <br /> required for Neighborhoods K and L. The storm drain system would consist of <br /> 3 gravity-flow pipelines, constructed under neighborhood streets and easements, <br /> with lateral pipes to catch basins installed along the curbs and gutters. These <br /> storm drains would collect surface runoff and ultimately convey it to Mountain <br /> House Creek. Local storm drains along most side streets would convey storm <br /> 1, runoff to large storm drains(trunks)along major arterial streets. <br /> The storm drain system would be designed to accommodate runoff flows from <br /> { the 10-year storm event unless a 100-year storm event would cause excessive <br /> street flooding that could prevent access for emergency vehicles. if this situation <br /> would occur,that portion of the system would be designed to accommodate a <br /> 100-year storm event. Mountain House creek has already been constructed to <br /> accommodate 100-year storm flows and no further modifications are needed.A <br /> 10-year storm has a 10-percent statistical chance of occurring every year, and a <br /> r � <br /> sari 1) 5-201 <br />