My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008577
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HENDERSON
>
18500
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000267
>
SU0008577
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:34 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:09:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0008577
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000267
STREET_NUMBER
18500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HENDERSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
APN
20917003
ENTERED_DATE
1/7/2011 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18500 S HENDERSON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/7/2011 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000267\SU0008577\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000267\SU0008577\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000267\SU0008577\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000267\SU0008577\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
adopted plans. It incorporates a coordinated system of auto, pedestrian, and <br /> bicycle facilities that provide efficient access within the project and to <br /> commercial and public destinations (e.g., K-8 school, Neighborhood Park, <br /> Mountain House Creek Community Park). It creates distinctive and livable <br /> residential environments. In addition, all landscape, hardscape and street <br /> elements within the proposed subdivisions would be designed and constructed <br /> in accordance with the adopted MHCSD Design Manual and community <br /> approvals regarding specific themes and material variation. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the site is physically suitable to accommodate the residential uses proposed. <br /> This analysis is based on the improvements proposed; the assessment of the <br /> hydrology and water quality of the site; and the use of BMPs (Best Management <br /> Practices)for storm drainage improvement. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • This finding can be made since the analysis conducted by CDD has found that <br /> the area proposed for development is adequate in size to accommodate the <br /> density of development proposed, consistent with the Master Plan and Specific <br /> Plan II. <br /> 5. Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause <br /> substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or <br /> their habitat. <br /> • This finding can be made because the proposed subdivisions,as conditioned, r <br /> would be required to comply with applicable Federal and State laws for the <br /> protection of fish or wildlife or their habitat(e.g., Section 401 of the Clean Water <br /> Act with respect to Mountain House Creek water quality; Section 404 of the Clean <br /> Water Act for creek modifications; Federal and State Endangered Species Acts), <br /> and because the applicant will participate in the San Joaquin County Multi- <br /> Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). The proposed <br /> subdivisions would also be subject to the Mountain House community <br /> monitoring and mitigation monitoring programs. In addition,the project <br /> incorporates all pertinent mitigation measures identified in the Mountain House <br /> Master Plan Master EIR,and the expanded Mountain House Specific Plan II Initial <br /> Study did not find any additional potentially significant impacts. <br /> 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to cause significant public <br /> health problems. <br /> • This finding can be made since CDD has concluded (based on the Specific Plan ll <br /> Initial Study)that the design of the subdivisions, as conditioned,would either <br /> have no impact or less than significant impact on the health of future residents. <br /> 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements <br /> acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed <br /> subdivision. <br /> • This finding can be made because there are no public access easements that <br /> would be acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property <br /> within the proposed subdivision that will be negatively affected by the proposed <br /> 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.