My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
6732
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544809
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2019 11:38:47 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:30:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544809
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0004030
FACILITY_NAME
THREE PALMS GROCERY
STREET_NUMBER
6732
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
10110001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6732 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Environmental Health Department Donna Heran, RENS <br /> �o.;• ' c° ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> 600 East Main Street Laurie Cotulla. REHS <br /> VY Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> i <br /> •/ _ - Carl Borgman, REHS <br /> Mike Huggins, REHS, RDI <br /> Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Margaret Lagorio, REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 Robert McClellon, REHS <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 ,teff Carruesco, REHS,RDI <br /> Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> June 30, 2008 <br /> Linda Migliori <br /> 2881 N. Arata Rd <br /> Stockton, CA 95215 <br /> Subject: Three Palms Grocery SITE CODE: 1830 <br /> 6732 Hwy 88 <br /> Stockton, CA <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed "Corrective <br /> Action Plan for Three Palms Grocery" (CAP) dated June 18, 2008, prepared by ATC Associates <br /> Inc. for the above subject site and provides the following comments. <br /> In the Background Information it states that underground storage tanks (UST's) #4 and #1 were <br /> closed in place, #3 was removed and that two other UST's remain in place. Please note that <br /> UST's #2 and #5 were removed in February 2005 and there are no operating tanks at this site so <br /> the Background Information should be updated accordingly. <br /> The CAP discussed soil remedial alternatives of natural attenuation, vapor extraction and <br /> excavation and recommended vapor extraction. The CAP did not provide costs for the remedial <br /> alternatives and evaluate their cost-effectiveness. Please note that contaminated sites are to be <br /> cleaned up in a reasonable time and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (CVRWQCB) has indicated that a 10 year time period should be considered. Natural attenuation <br /> as a remedial alternative will not meet this time frame. The CAP should provide details and costs <br /> for comparison of excavation and vapor extraction and recommend the most cost-effective <br /> remedial alternative for the soil. <br /> The CAP discussed groundwater remedial alternatives of pump and treat and natural attenuation <br /> and recommended natural attenuation. The CAP did not provide costs for the groundwater <br /> remedial alternatives either. The pump and treat alternative states that treated water would be <br /> discharged into the City of Stockton sanitary sewer if allowed by the City of Stockton. Please note <br /> that there are no City of Stockton services at this site. The water would have to be stored on site <br /> and transported to an appropriate disposal facility. The typical pump and treat alternative will likely <br /> not be cost-effective. Perhaps, remediation of the contamination in the soil will prevent further <br /> leaching of the contaminants into the groundwater and natural attenuation will clean up the <br /> groundwater in a reasonable time. Other remedial alternatives such as batch extraction and <br /> disposal, air sparging, biosparging or in-situ oxidation should be evaluated. Since it is first <br /> encountered groundwater that is contaminated and during the summer and fall months the shallow <br /> screened wells are often dry, vapor extraction or dual phase extraction may be viable remedial <br /> alternatives as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.