Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Environmental Health Department Donna Heran, RENS <br /> �o.;• ' c° ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> 600 East Main Street Laurie Cotulla. REHS <br /> VY Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> i <br /> •/ _ - Carl Borgman, REHS <br /> Mike Huggins, REHS, RDI <br /> Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Margaret Lagorio, REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 Robert McClellon, REHS <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 ,teff Carruesco, REHS,RDI <br /> Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> June 30, 2008 <br /> Linda Migliori <br /> 2881 N. Arata Rd <br /> Stockton, CA 95215 <br /> Subject: Three Palms Grocery SITE CODE: 1830 <br /> 6732 Hwy 88 <br /> Stockton, CA <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed "Corrective <br /> Action Plan for Three Palms Grocery" (CAP) dated June 18, 2008, prepared by ATC Associates <br /> Inc. for the above subject site and provides the following comments. <br /> In the Background Information it states that underground storage tanks (UST's) #4 and #1 were <br /> closed in place, #3 was removed and that two other UST's remain in place. Please note that <br /> UST's #2 and #5 were removed in February 2005 and there are no operating tanks at this site so <br /> the Background Information should be updated accordingly. <br /> The CAP discussed soil remedial alternatives of natural attenuation, vapor extraction and <br /> excavation and recommended vapor extraction. The CAP did not provide costs for the remedial <br /> alternatives and evaluate their cost-effectiveness. Please note that contaminated sites are to be <br /> cleaned up in a reasonable time and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (CVRWQCB) has indicated that a 10 year time period should be considered. Natural attenuation <br /> as a remedial alternative will not meet this time frame. The CAP should provide details and costs <br /> for comparison of excavation and vapor extraction and recommend the most cost-effective <br /> remedial alternative for the soil. <br /> The CAP discussed groundwater remedial alternatives of pump and treat and natural attenuation <br /> and recommended natural attenuation. The CAP did not provide costs for the groundwater <br /> remedial alternatives either. The pump and treat alternative states that treated water would be <br /> discharged into the City of Stockton sanitary sewer if allowed by the City of Stockton. Please note <br /> that there are no City of Stockton services at this site. The water would have to be stored on site <br /> and transported to an appropriate disposal facility. The typical pump and treat alternative will likely <br /> not be cost-effective. Perhaps, remediation of the contamination in the soil will prevent further <br /> leaching of the contaminants into the groundwater and natural attenuation will clean up the <br /> groundwater in a reasonable time. Other remedial alternatives such as batch extraction and <br /> disposal, air sparging, biosparging or in-situ oxidation should be evaluated. Since it is first <br /> encountered groundwater that is contaminated and during the summer and fall months the shallow <br /> screened wells are often dry, vapor extraction or dual phase extraction may be viable remedial <br /> alternatives as well. <br />