Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Skibo <br /> July 9, 2004 <br /> Page 10 <br /> engineered or non-standard septic system. We recommend a Civil Engineer prepare a septic <br /> system design for Parcel 2 unless additional percolation testing on Parcel 2 indicates a <br /> j satisfactory rate is achieved and approved by the EHD. <br /> I/ Should the existing septic systems on Parcel 1 ever require relocation, the EHD may require <br /> these systems to be engineered unless percolation tests indicate satisfactory results. <br /> j 8.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing <br /> and proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they <br /> existed at the time we excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was <br /> assumed that the test holes and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface <br /> conditions in the general area. <br /> Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions <br /> proposed in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This <br /> warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and <br /> statements of professional opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or <br /> implied. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> NEIL O. ANDERSON & ASSOC., INC. <br /> SD GL-oz <br /> J. WF�10 Q,' <br /> p� No. 2151 S 4 <br /> Welch, M.Sc., Senior Geologist CERTIFIED <br /> CEG-2151, CHG-653, GP-1049 ENGINEERING <br /> � GEOLOGIST <br /> Environmental Division Manager y �' <br /> �TFop CAL�Fo <br />