Laserfiche WebLink
kqKLEINFELDER <br /> Table 1 <br /> Summary of analytical results <br /> ` SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 2/2/05 <br /> ANALYTE Ll-0" L2-0" L3-0" L4-0" L5-0" BGl-0" LI-PM <br /> ` TPH-D ND 0.36 ND ND ND ND 0.91 <br /> Cr+ ND ND ND ND ND ND ND <br /> UNITS Milli ams per a liter <br /> L ND =None Detected <br /> For detailed analytical results of the requested analytes, refer to the laboratory analytical reports <br /> ►� in Appendix B. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1. TPH-D was detected in one of five shallow soil samples collected from immediately beneath <br /> the parking lot base(L2-0"), with a concentration of 0.36 mg/l, and from the rinseate of the <br /> parent material (Ll-PM) with a concentration of 0.91 mg/l. Based on this data it appears <br /> TPH-D has the ability to leach from the parent material at relatively low levels (< lmg/1) <br /> under ambient conditions. The subsurface shallow soil sampling results appear to indicate <br /> that leachable TPH-D has impacted one of the five samples at concentrations at <br /> approximately 1/3d of the TPH-D concentration detected in the parent material. Please note <br /> however that this particular sample (L2-0") was noted in a trailer parking area and as such the <br /> TPH-D contaminant may potentially be related to incidental small spills of diesel powered <br /> trucks. Based on these sampling results and the concentrations of TPH-D detected, it is <br /> Kleinfelder's opinion that regulatory agencies would not require mitigation at these low <br /> levels. Based on the estimated depth to groundwater of approximately 20 feet bgs obtained <br /> from SJCFCD and the limited source material and reported TPH-D concentrations, it is <br /> Kleinfelder's opinion that there is a low probability of contaminants impacting groundwater <br /> from this source material. <br /> 2. Hexavalent chromium was not detected in any of the shallow soil samples collected from <br /> immediately beneath the parking lot base or in the rinseate of the concrete tile material <br /> included in the base. Based on the results, Kleinfelder does not recommend any additional <br /> r.. sampling and analysis for hexavalent chromium at the subject site at this time. <br /> 3. In accordance with the EHD permitting requirements, Kleinfelder recommends submitting a <br /> copy of this report to the San Joaquin County EHD. <br /> 4. Although the sampling results show relatively small concentrations of TPH-D leaching from <br /> the parent material, Kleinfelder recommends that no additional tile be brought onto the site as <br /> an aggregate base or other use in which leachable TPH-D may impact soil at the subject site. <br /> r <br /> 52495.E01/ST05R268/FB:Iv Page of <br /> m 2005,Kleinfelder, Inc. March 8,2005 <br /> r <br /> V <br />