Laserfiche WebLink
8.0 IDENTIFIED CONTAMINATION SOURCES <br /> The following sources of past, current, on-site, and off-site contamination have been <br /> identified as a result of this investigation: <br /> Identified Contamination Source Evaluation & Recommendations <br /> 1. The Site was developed for agriculture in Agricultural chemicals may remain in Site <br /> 1952 or earlier. It is currently an almond soils. The only way to determine the <br /> orchard. (Current and Past on-site) presence or absence of these chemicals <br /> is by testing and analysis. Typically, any <br /> such testing is conducted at the property <br /> owner's discretion. <br /> 2. Surrounding properties are used for Agricultural chemicals continue to be <br /> agriculture. (Current and past off-site) applied to these sites. Assuming <br /> responsible application, no action is <br /> warranted at this time. <br /> 3. Three wells (two irrigation wells and one It appears that the wells and septic <br /> domestic/irrigation well) are located on system are currently in use. <br /> the Site. According to the Tentative <br /> Parcel Map prepared by Quartaroli & <br /> Associates, one septic system is also on <br /> the Site. (Current on-site) <br /> 4. The existing structures on the Site were Lead- and asbestos-containing materials <br /> built in the 1970s. Based on the aerial may be present in the existing structures. <br /> photographs reviewed, it appears that In the event of demolition or remodeling, <br /> three former structures were present on a lead and asbestos survey should be <br /> the Site from the 1960s through the conducted prior to the start of activities. <br /> 1970s. (Current and past on-site) Lead may be present in the soil <br /> surrounding the painted buildings and <br /> former structures. The ground beneath <br /> the structures and former structures may <br /> have been treated with environmentally <br /> persistent pesticides. Underground <br /> infrastructure may exist in the vicinity of <br /> the former structures as well. Should any <br /> demolition, renovation or construction be <br /> planned, the property owner should <br /> consider these possibilities before <br /> disturbing the soil in the area of the <br /> building footprints. <br /> LOGE 1225 Page 7 <br />