Laserfiche WebLink
SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY' <FINDING.S <br /> A. SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING STUDY.AREA INFORMATION <br /> SSS'§ 1.1. The-project site is-near the terminal end of North Jacob Brack Road, north of Turner <br /> Road: Jacob Brack Road is the west frontage road of Interstate 5 at this location. There are no <br /> Municipal utilities near the site and probably never will be, at least not for several decades. <br /> Consequently; the Winery facility must utilize a decentralized domestic wastewater management <br /> system and on-site well water. <br /> Surrounding land use to the north, south, east and west of the7prcject is, and has been, in <br /> agricultural-production formany decades. The closest-developinentmay be considered Flag City <br /> at the intersection of Interstate 5 and Highway 12. ;The City of Lodi is.approximately eight miles to <br /> the.southeast.. The two subject Parcels are zoned AG-40, Agricultural. <br /> Before the subject Parcel was planted in vineyard, forage crops- primarily corn for milk cow silage <br /> was grown. At the time of vineyard planting;the soil was ripped with an eight-foot slip plow. The <br /> areas where percolation testing was conducted had been ripped. <br /> _ SSS '31,3.2s 3.3,3.41)3.5 3.6. Applications on microfiche file with the EHD reveal that there <br /> have been no permits'issued for repairs/additions to existing.systerris_within a one-half mile <br /> surrounding the project site,'.except for the on-site residential structure.. Permits in this specific area . <br /> of San Joaquin County would be few since County land surrounding theWinery site-is sparsely <br /> developed. No'septic system permits for the installation of the aforementioned on-site mound <br /> system were found: <br /> The project site has relatively level terrain; consequently, there will be no need to incorporate design <br /> considerations for slopes within the disposal area: Nor are there dramatic elevational differences <br /> between the lift station from the actual Winery facility to the proposed-.effluent disposal area. <br /> B. SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS°AND ANALYTICAL.TEST RESULTS <br /> The United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS) indicates the <br /> on-site soils that will accept the facility's domestic wastewater to consistof a.Deyries sandy loam <br /> (#149). This corresponds with the laboratory soil texture analyses.-_ <br /> SSS'§ 5.2. .Thesurface and subsurface soil investigation and testing began with excavating two <br /> backhoe test pits at the east and west test locations. These two deep excavations provided: 1.) A <br /> profile of the underlying soil characteristics, 2:) Depth to groundwater, which was found to be <br /> approximately_nine feet below grade for both locations; 3.).A.sample of saturated soiVformation <br /> material, and 4 ) A water table sample-for analysis, as illustrated in-Table 4. No rust mottling was <br /> observed.in either.of these test excavations, which would indicate seasonal soilsaturation. <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />