My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005358
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JAHANT
>
9400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-14
>
SU0005358
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:38 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:32:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005358
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-14
STREET_NUMBER
9400
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
JAHANT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00706043
ENTERED_DATE
8/30/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9400 E JAHANT RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\J\JAHANT\9400\SU-92-14\SU0005358\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\J\JAHANT\9400\SU-92-14\SU0005358\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\J\JAHANT\9400\SU-92-14\SU0005358\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\J\JAHANT\9400\SU-92-14\SU0005358\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item No. 3 <br /> PC: 1-16-92 <br /> GP-92-5/ZR-92-5 <br /> Page 3 <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> POLICY CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> General Plan and Zoning: <br /> The change in the text of the General Plan does not conflict with General Plan Policies and <br /> Principles because it allows the Community Development Department to implement the AL-5 zone <br /> (Limited Agriculture, 5-acre minimum parcel size) that was adopted by the Board of Supervisors <br /> as Ordinance No. 3447 and which became effective on January 14, 1989. The text of the existing <br /> General Plan permits a density of only one dwelling unit per ten acres, rather than the five acres <br /> needed to implement the AL-5 zone. <br /> The site is designated Agriculture on the General Plan, with an accompanying zone of AG-40. <br /> The proposed Zone Reclassification is consistent with both the existing General Plan designation <br /> and the proposed General Plan 2010 Map for the site (refer to the 'Zoning' and 'Draft Zoning" <br /> maps). <br /> Resolution No. R-91-258, which was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 2, 1991, <br /> requires that all General Plan Amendment applications submitted after September 19, 1989, 'shall <br /> not result in increased demand upon the water supply currently available to San Joaquin County <br /> as of the date of adoption of this policy.' The Department of Public Works has determined that <br /> the Resolution applies only to General Plan Map Amendment applications, not to General Plan <br /> Text Amendment applications. For this reason this project, involving an amendment of the text <br /> of the General Plan, is not subject to the provisions of the Resolution. The Department of Public <br /> Works has indicated that if this application were subject to the Resolution,residential development <br /> of this type generally demands as much or less water than normal agricultural activities on an <br /> average parcel of cultivated farmland. <br /> Development Requirements: <br /> In the event that the applications are approved and the Major Subdivision application is submitted <br /> for the underlying project, the resultant parcels will be subject to the Development Requirements <br /> for agricultural areas: private wells, septic systems, and natural storm water drainage. The <br /> Environmental Health Division of Public Health Services has reviewed the applicants'soil suitability <br /> study and indicated that the subject parcel may be developed with septic systems. <br /> AREA/NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: <br /> Agricultural Compatibility: <br /> The letter received from the San Joaquin Farm Bureau Federation (Attachment B) expressed its <br /> opposition to the project on the grounds that it will create new concentrations of small-scale <br /> agricultural operations, rather than preserving and recognizing existing areas, and it will lead to <br /> the premature and permanent conversion of agricultural land, both of which the Bureau feels <br /> represent inconsistencies with the General Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.