Laserfiche WebLink
FFarea, <br /> 5.3, and 5.4) A Log ofBoring using the Unified Soil Classification System (U.S.C.S.), asd in a 13-foot deep backhoe test pit completed on Parcel 1 near the proposed leachfieldfound on the EHD PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHEET. <br /> ly, the underlying soils show a consistent very fine sandy silt with some clay down to the <br /> excavation depth of 13 feet. No cemented silts hardpan soil stratum was discernible at depths <br /> exceeding five feet. However, as referenced, a cemented silts hardpan was encountered at 40-42 <br /> inches, that was sufficient to impeded permeability to an observable degree. <br /> t.(§ 6.1) Percolation testing was conducted in the location illustrated on the Tentative Map and <br /> Parcel detail map found in Appendix C. The pert test location and subsequent leachfield <br /> installation for Parcel 1 are south of where the house is to be built. It is my understanding the <br /> septic tank will not be on the building pad. The disposal field is to consist of a gravity filter bed to <br /> reduce the disposal area footprint. A future vineyard is to be planted around Parcel 1 and will be <br /> under drip irrigation and not flood irrigated; therefore, there should be no problems associated with <br /> inundation. <br /> This test location maintains sufficient distance requirements between wells, property lines, etc. <br /> The following information describes the preparation of the percolation test boring and the actual <br /> percolation testing: <br /> 4§ 6.2, 6.3 and 6.5) On March 28, 2007, 1740 hrs, one shallow perc test boring of 42 inches and <br /> one perc test boring of 36 inches were hand-drilled on proposed Parcel 1. No perc test was <br /> conducted on the Designated Remainder, as referenced. A shallower perc test of 36 inches was <br /> drilled because at 40-42 inches a thin cemented silts hardpan was encountered in hand-drilling. <br /> The test borings are illustrated on the Tentative Map and S.J.C. Aerial Parcel Viewer Map. <br /> The sidewalls of the shallow borings were scored with a pry-bar and the loose material removed. <br /> Two inches of fine gravel was placed at the bottom and a three-inch perforated PVC pipe was <br /> inserted into each test boring. The borings were pre-saturated on March 29, 2006 at 1130 hrs with <br /> 12 inches of clear water. <br /> -4-(§ 6.4) On March 30, 2006, 1010 firs,percolation testing commenced. There was no standing water <br /> after the 24-hour soak period in the perc tests boring due to the sandy-silty type soil, as illustrated in <br /> Table 1 below. Consequently, EHD Perc Test Procedure#2 was conducted. <br /> The last half hour of the test was witnessed by Lisa Medina, R.E.H.S. of the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department. The maximum acceptable perc rate is 60 min/in for shallow <br /> perc tests. <br /> x(§"5.4 and 6.8) The following Table illustrates the proposed Parcel number, septic system <br /> structure to be installed based on the depth of the passing perc rate and the comparatively shallow <br /> depth to groundwater, proposed acreage,post soak period status and perc test results for the <br /> respective perc test. As illustrated, the 42-inch depth test boring had a perc rate twice as slow as <br /> the 36-inch depth, indicating the slower permeability of the encountered cemented silts hardpan. <br /> Page -3- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />