Laserfiche WebLink
P6.6 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings)was provided with REHS <br /> verification signature. The rate was correctly calculated using the last reading. See <br /> Appendix for Test Result Form. <br /> TEST HOLE PERCOLATION RATE <br /> 1 (Parcel 1) 19 MIN./IN. <br /> F 2 (Parcel 2) 31 MIN./IN. <br /> 3 (Parcel 3) 18 MIN./IN. <br /> V 4 (Designated Remainder) 19 MIN./IN. <br /> *See Results in Appendix. <br /> ' 6.7 Discussion of any potent ional <br /> roblems predicted and/or the need for an <br /> p <br /> engineered or alternative septic system. In this area,the sails are classified as Capay <br /> Clay and El Solyo Clay loam. Due to this classification and percolation rate, a <br /> non-engineered standard septic would be recommended. <br /> 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future <br /> leach fields needed at the site. Based on the results of theerc 1 <br /> p o atxon rates and sails <br /> profile, it is Dillon & Murphy's opinion that the subject proposed Parcels are suited for <br /> typical on-site sewage disposal systems. The system should be properly designed and <br /> installed according to the current San Joaquin County criteria for standard septic systems. <br /> FBased on the depth to groundwater in the area, and the size of the proposed parcels, <br /> it is our opinion that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if properly installed, <br /> should not adversely affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> I <br /> The� <br /> Fi conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding proposed <br /> the <br /> development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the <br /> time we excavated our test hole andperformed the percolation test. It was assumed that the <br /> test holes and percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the <br /> general area. <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusionsro osed <br /> p p <br /> in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This <br /> warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and <br /> statements of professional opinion do not constitute a guarantee warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> /� c� oe Murphy <br /> ,U -_ - ;'! R.C.E. 45,277 <br /> 52 <br /> Fl� sal <br /> � l <br /> sTgr crv►� �, <br /> 4 <br />