My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004098
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
35775
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0300550
>
SU0004098
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004098
PE
2605
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0300550
STREET_NUMBER
35775
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
35775 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
3/10/2004 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\35775\PA-0300550\SU0004098\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
683
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4 <br /> Alternatives Analysis <br /> CEQA Requirements <br /> Section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires a draft EIR to describe a <br /> reasonable range of feasible alternatives to the proposed Project or to its location <br /> that could attain the Project's basic objectives while reducing or eliminating one <br /> or more of the significant adverse impacts of the proposed Project. The range of <br /> alternatives that must be presented is governed by a"rule of reason"that requires <br /> the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. <br /> Among the factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility <br /> of alternatives are site suitability, economic viability,availability of <br /> infrastructure,general plan consistency, other plans or regulatory limitations, <br /> jurisdictional boundaries, and whether the project Applicant can reasonably <br /> acquire,control, or otherwise have access to the alternative site. <br /> This chapter describes the alternatives to the proposed Project and compares the <br /> r. anticipated environmental impacts of the alternatives to those of the proposed <br /> Project, analyzed in Chapter 3. <br /> As described in Chapter 2,the Applicant's goal is to develop the maximum <br /> known aggregate reserves that can feasibly be mined within the current design <br /> plan area. The Applicant has identified the following specific objectives to meet <br /> this goal(the County has not identified any separate or additional goals for the <br /> Project): <br /> ■ Location: Secure approvals to mine the reserves on site,which are located <br /> in the southwestern portion of San Joaquin County,thus providing a reliable <br /> and economic source to meet current and projected demand in the region. <br /> ■ Profit: Responsibly operate a profitable aggregate mine and processing <br /> ` facility. <br /> ■ Period: Provide for approximately 40 years of approved aggregate <br /> — extraction, in accordance with availability of known resource reserves, <br /> mining and reclamation plans, and foreseeable market demands. <br /> Implementation and monitoring final reclamation activities would be <br /> completed within 6-12 months of exhaustion of reserves or expiration of the <br /> ` permit. <br /> DeSilva Gates Quarry Project <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report 4_1 <br /> AS 05105.05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.