Laserfiche WebLink
` III.C.2 All Feasible Fugitive PM10 Mitigation Measures Were Not <br /> Required <br /> 1. <br /> The Draft EIR erroneously concluded that mitigated construction PM10 <br /> emissions would not be significant. (Draft EIR, Impact 4.6.1, p. 4.6-18.) However, as <br /> .. discussed above, mitigated construction PM10 impacts remain significant, requiring <br /> additional mitigation. Further, the Draft EIR concluded that PM10 impacts from <br /> Project operation were not significant and did not require any mitigation. (Draft EIR, <br /> pp. 4.6-22 and 6-11.) Comment IV.B explains why this is not correct. Thus, this <br /> comment discusses mitigation measures for fugitive dust from both Project <br /> construction and operation, because the activities involved and, thus, control <br /> ` methods are similar. <br /> B-25 <br /> r, There are numerous additional relevant and reasonable measures contained <br /> in the CEQA Guidelines and rules of air districts and other agencies that should be <br /> required to mitigate the significant construction PM10 emissions from this Project. <br /> Further, several agencies have conducted comprehensive studies of fugitive dust <br /> control measures to bring their region into compliance with national ambient air <br /> quality standards on PM10. <br /> The SCAQMD has sponsored research, passed regulations (e.g., Rule 403),16 <br /> ` and published guidelines that identify best management practices for controlling <br /> fugitive dusts at construction sites. The Rule 403 lurplementation Handbookl7 contains a <br /> comprehensive list of such measures. <br /> Clark County, Nevada, has also sponsored research, passed regulations <br /> L (Rule 94), and published best management practices for controlling fugitive dust <br /> from construction activities.18 Clark County's Construction Activities Notebook <br /> contains a comprehensive list of best management practices. Similarly, Arizona has <br /> f. developed guidance to control fugitive PM10 emissions. (ADEQ 6/5/01?9) <br /> L <br /> 1e South Coast Air Quality Management District,Revised Final Staff Report for Proposed Amended <br /> Rule 403,Fugitive Dust and Proposed Rule 1186,PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads, <br /> and livestock Operations,February 14,1997. <br /> 17 South Coast Air Quality Management District,Rule 403 bnplementation Handbook,January 1999. <br /> 18 P.M.Fransioli,PM10 Emissions Control Research Sponsored by Clark County,Nevada, <br /> Proceedings of the Air&Waste Management Association's 94th Annual Conference&Exhibition, <br /> L Orlando,FL,June 24-28,2001, <br /> 19 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality("ADEQ"), Air Quality Exceptional and Natural <br /> Events Policy PM10 Best Available Control Measures,June 5,2M. <br /> k 15 <br /> 1. <br />