Laserfiche WebLink
summary tables in the Draft EIR. This does not meet a draft EIR's burden to explain <br /> and disclose the basis for its conclusions. <br /> We set out some of the problems we discovered from reviewing these <br /> spreadsheets below. These problems resulted in substantial underestimates of <br /> emissions from Project operation. We believe there are likely more errors than we <br /> discovered due to the shortness of time for this review, truncated by the late receipt B-26 <br /> of the supporting calculations. The emission calculations should be comprehensively Dont. <br /> reviewed by an experienced professional and described and annotated in an <br /> appendix to the Draft EIR. The problems identified below should be corrected. <br /> The Excel spreadsheets in Exhibit 1 indicate that operational emissions arise <br /> from: (1)quarry processing operations; (2) concrete production; (3) asphalt <br /> production; (4) recycling construction materials; (5) haul trucks; and (6) various <br /> fugitive sources. The emissions from these sources were substantially <br /> underestimated. <br /> IV.A Emission Estimates Must Be Based on Maximum Potential <br /> Production Rate <br /> The courts have required that an EIR must analyze all aspects of a project that <br /> are reasonably foreseeable consequences of the project. (See Laurel Heights <br /> Improvement Assn v Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988)47 C3d 376, 396, 253 CR 426, 433 in <br /> which a general standard was set out for determining when a future activity must be <br /> analyzed.) When information is scarce or where there are possible variations in B-27 <br /> project operation, EIRs typically employ a reasonable worst-case analysis in order to <br /> capture the largest expected potential change from existing baseline conditions. This <br /> approach is not mandated by CEQA but is a common practice to address — <br /> uncertainty, particularly for large projects such as this one. See, for example, the <br /> discussion in the SCAQMD CEQA Guidelines which explains: "[t]he daily emissions <br /> estimate should be based on the highest daily emissions (including weekdays and <br /> weekends)." (SCAQMD 4/93, pp. 6-3, 9-5.)The emission estimates in the Draft EIR <br /> are not based on reasonably foreseeable operating modes of the proposed facility <br /> and thus substantially underestimate potential emissions. <br /> W.A.I Operating Hours <br /> The Draft EIR states the Project will operate up to 24 hours per day, 6 days a <br /> week, Monday through Saturday with maintenance occurring on Sundays. (Draft B-28 - <br /> EIR, p. 3-8.) The Draft EIR also states that overnight operation would only occur as <br /> needed for special contract jobs requiring nighttime delivery but does not restrict the <br /> number of such days. (Draft EIR, p. 3-22.) Thus, the reasonably foreseeable <br /> 20 <br />