Laserfiche WebLink
While portions of some of these measures are included as part of the Draft <br /> EIR's mitigation measures, the above measures are generally far more protective <br /> than those recommended for this Project. All of these measures are feasible and B-25 <br /> various combinations of them are routinely required elsewhere to reduce fugitive cont. <br /> PM10 emissions. See, for example, the fugitive dust control program for the Big <br /> Dig26, for the El Toro Reuse Draft EIR27, and for the Padres Ballpark Final EIR28. <br /> IV. PROJECT OPERATIONAL IMPACTS ARE UNDERESTIMATED <br /> 6. The Draft EIR finds significant unavoidable impacts on air quality from <br /> operation of the Project after implementation of its sole mitigation measure, the use <br /> of new on-site off-road equipment and haul trucks. (Draft EIR, pp. 4.6-21 -4.6-24.) <br /> 1„ As discussed in the following comments, the Draft EIR substantially underestimated <br /> potential operational emissions from the Project, and thus failed to disclose the <br /> magnitude of impacts on air quality resulting from operation of the Project. <br /> V B-26 <br /> The Draft EIR summarizes emissions from the Project in three brief tables for <br /> Ldifferent production levels ranging from 1.7 to 4.0 million tons per year. (Draft EIR, <br /> Tables 4.6-5A, 4.6-5B and 4.6-5C.) As discussed in Comment I, the Draft EIR does not <br /> explain how these emissions were calculated, preventing meaningful public review. <br /> 1 6 We thus requested support for the operational emissions from ESA and were <br /> provided the Excel spreadsheets attached to these comments as Exhibit 1 two weeks <br /> before these comments were due. These spreadsheets were extraordinarily difficult <br /> 6„ to review because they contain numerous calculation errors; labeling and unit errors; <br /> and erroneous assumptions. Further, the emission factors that are used are not <br /> annotated as to source, and the large collection of spreadsheets contains no roadmap <br /> to lead the reviewer from dozens of unlabeled spreadsheets and columns to the <br /> L 26 A.Kasprak and P.A.Stakutis, A Comprehensive Air Quality Control Program for a Large Roadway <br /> Tunnel Project,Proceedings of the Air&Waste Management Associations 93rd Annual Conference 7 <br /> Exhibition,June 18-22,2000. <br /> L 27 County of Orange,Draft Environmental Impact Report No.573 for the Civilian Reuse of Marine <br /> Corps Air Station El Toro and the Airport System Master Plan for John Wayne Airport and Proposed <br /> Orange County International Airport,Draft Supplemental Analysis,Volume 1,April 2001,pp.2-121 <br /> to 2-123. <br /> L <br /> 28 City of San Diego, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report to the Final Master <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the Centre City Redevelopment Project and Addressing the Centre <br /> L City Community Plan and Related Documents for the Proposed Ballpark and Ancillary Development <br /> Projects,and Associated Plan Amendments,V.IV.Responses to Comments,September 13,1999, <br /> pp.IV-254 to IV-256. <br /> I� <br /> 19 <br /> L <br />