My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While portions of some of these measures are included as part of the Draft <br /> EIR's mitigation measures, the above measures are generally far more protective <br /> than those recommended for this Project. All of these measures are feasible and B-25 <br /> various combinations of them are routinely required elsewhere to reduce fugitive cont. <br /> PM10 emissions. See, for example, the fugitive dust control program for the Big <br /> Dig26, for the El Toro Reuse Draft EIR27, and for the Padres Ballpark Final EIR28. <br /> IV. PROJECT OPERATIONAL IMPACTS ARE UNDERESTIMATED <br /> 6. The Draft EIR finds significant unavoidable impacts on air quality from <br /> operation of the Project after implementation of its sole mitigation measure, the use <br /> of new on-site off-road equipment and haul trucks. (Draft EIR, pp. 4.6-21 -4.6-24.) <br /> 1„ As discussed in the following comments, the Draft EIR substantially underestimated <br /> potential operational emissions from the Project, and thus failed to disclose the <br /> magnitude of impacts on air quality resulting from operation of the Project. <br /> V B-26 <br /> The Draft EIR summarizes emissions from the Project in three brief tables for <br /> Ldifferent production levels ranging from 1.7 to 4.0 million tons per year. (Draft EIR, <br /> Tables 4.6-5A, 4.6-5B and 4.6-5C.) As discussed in Comment I, the Draft EIR does not <br /> explain how these emissions were calculated, preventing meaningful public review. <br /> 1 6 We thus requested support for the operational emissions from ESA and were <br /> provided the Excel spreadsheets attached to these comments as Exhibit 1 two weeks <br /> before these comments were due. These spreadsheets were extraordinarily difficult <br /> 6„ to review because they contain numerous calculation errors; labeling and unit errors; <br /> and erroneous assumptions. Further, the emission factors that are used are not <br /> annotated as to source, and the large collection of spreadsheets contains no roadmap <br /> to lead the reviewer from dozens of unlabeled spreadsheets and columns to the <br /> L 26 A.Kasprak and P.A.Stakutis, A Comprehensive Air Quality Control Program for a Large Roadway <br /> Tunnel Project,Proceedings of the Air&Waste Management Associations 93rd Annual Conference 7 <br /> Exhibition,June 18-22,2000. <br /> L 27 County of Orange,Draft Environmental Impact Report No.573 for the Civilian Reuse of Marine <br /> Corps Air Station El Toro and the Airport System Master Plan for John Wayne Airport and Proposed <br /> Orange County International Airport,Draft Supplemental Analysis,Volume 1,April 2001,pp.2-121 <br /> to 2-123. <br /> L <br /> 28 City of San Diego, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report to the Final Master <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the Centre City Redevelopment Project and Addressing the Centre <br /> L City Community Plan and Related Documents for the Proposed Ballpark and Ancillary Development <br /> Projects,and Associated Plan Amendments,V.IV.Responses to Comments,September 13,1999, <br /> pp.IV-254 to IV-256. <br /> I� <br /> 19 <br /> L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.