My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of Environmental Health Assessment ("OEHHA") published a chronic reference <br /> exposure level of 3 µg/m3 for crystalline silica in February 2005.71 The unit risk <br /> factor for crystalline silica ranges from 0.45 to 2.9x104 (ug/m3)-1. (CAPCOA 10/93,72 <br /> Table 111-7.) <br /> B-57 <br /> The Project will generate large amounts of fugitive dust that contain cont <br /> crystalline silica. The Draft EIR did not estimate crystalline silica emissions from the <br /> Project and generally does not include the type of information required to estimate <br /> ` these emissions. The Applicant should be required to measure crystalline silica in <br /> core samples collected from its deposits and the Draft EIR should be revised to <br /> analyze the public health risks from these emissions. <br /> VII.B Meteorological Data Are Inadequate and Result in Underestimate <br /> of Impacts <br /> The public health impact analysis used air dispersion modeling to estimate <br /> L ambient concentrations of toxic air contaminants. This modeling relied on five years <br /> of meteorological data from the Fresno Airport. These airport data, collected at a <br /> location about 112 miles from the Project site, are neither site-specific nor is the <br /> quality of this data set acceptable for air dispersion modeling. The public health risk <br /> assessment which relies on these data for air modeling is therefore flawed and likely B-5B <br /> ` underestimates modeled concentrations and thus health risk, as discussed below. <br /> For air dispersion modeling purposes, airport data are among the least <br /> desirable. Problems with location and the general quality of data are the primary <br /> concerns. The USEPA, in their Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory <br /> Modeling Applications, summarizes these concerns about using airport data: <br /> For practical purposes, because airport data were readily available, <br /> most regulatory modeling was initially performed using these data; <br /> however, one should be aware that airport data, in general do not meet <br /> this guidance.73 <br /> L71 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment,Chronic Toxicity Summary,Silica(Crystalline, <br /> Respirable),Final, February 2005. <br /> http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/chronic_rels/pfd/SILICAcREL_FINAL.pdf <br /> 72 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association(CAPCOA), Air Toxics"Hot Spots" Program, <br /> Revised 1992 Risk Assessment Guidelines,October 1993. <br /> L73 USEPA,Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications,EPA454/R- <br /> 99-05,February 2000,p.1-1. <br /> L <br /> 47 <br /> L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.