Laserfiche WebLink
of Environmental Health Assessment ("OEHHA") published a chronic reference <br /> exposure level of 3 µg/m3 for crystalline silica in February 2005.71 The unit risk <br /> factor for crystalline silica ranges from 0.45 to 2.9x104 (ug/m3)-1. (CAPCOA 10/93,72 <br /> Table 111-7.) <br /> B-57 <br /> The Project will generate large amounts of fugitive dust that contain cont <br /> crystalline silica. The Draft EIR did not estimate crystalline silica emissions from the <br /> Project and generally does not include the type of information required to estimate <br /> ` these emissions. The Applicant should be required to measure crystalline silica in <br /> core samples collected from its deposits and the Draft EIR should be revised to <br /> analyze the public health risks from these emissions. <br /> VII.B Meteorological Data Are Inadequate and Result in Underestimate <br /> of Impacts <br /> The public health impact analysis used air dispersion modeling to estimate <br /> L ambient concentrations of toxic air contaminants. This modeling relied on five years <br /> of meteorological data from the Fresno Airport. These airport data, collected at a <br /> location about 112 miles from the Project site, are neither site-specific nor is the <br /> quality of this data set acceptable for air dispersion modeling. The public health risk <br /> assessment which relies on these data for air modeling is therefore flawed and likely B-5B <br /> ` underestimates modeled concentrations and thus health risk, as discussed below. <br /> For air dispersion modeling purposes, airport data are among the least <br /> desirable. Problems with location and the general quality of data are the primary <br /> concerns. The USEPA, in their Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory <br /> Modeling Applications, summarizes these concerns about using airport data: <br /> For practical purposes, because airport data were readily available, <br /> most regulatory modeling was initially performed using these data; <br /> however, one should be aware that airport data, in general do not meet <br /> this guidance.73 <br /> L71 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment,Chronic Toxicity Summary,Silica(Crystalline, <br /> Respirable),Final, February 2005. <br /> http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/chronic_rels/pfd/SILICAcREL_FINAL.pdf <br /> 72 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association(CAPCOA), Air Toxics"Hot Spots" Program, <br /> Revised 1992 Risk Assessment Guidelines,October 1993. <br /> L73 USEPA,Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications,EPA454/R- <br /> 99-05,February 2000,p.1-1. <br /> L <br /> 47 <br /> L <br />