Laserfiche WebLink
First and foremost, the Fresno airport data are not site-specific to the Project <br /> site. The distance involved (112 miles) makes the airport data clearly not site- <br /> specific, with numerous land use classifications existing between the Project and the <br /> airport. Most important, however, are the difference in land uses at the Project and <br /> the airport, respectively. Fresno Airport is comprised of concrete runways, parking <br /> lots, passenger terminals, and other structures associated with air travel activities. <br /> These surface and building characteristics in turn affect the boundary layer <br /> meteorology present at the airport.74 In addition, landings, takeoffs, and idling of <br /> airplanes affect the site-specific conditions at the airport such that the meteorological <br /> conditions are not representative of the area surrounding the Project site. <br /> The other major issue is the quality of the meteorological data collected at <br /> Fresno airport. Airport data are not collected with the thought of air dispersion <br /> modeling in mind. For example, airport conditions are typically reported once per _ <br /> hour, based on a single observation (usually) taken in the last ten minutes of each B-58 <br /> cont. <br /> hour. The U.S. EPA recommends that sampling rates of 60 to 360 per hour, at a <br /> minimum, be used to calculate hourly-averaged meteorological data 75 Air — <br /> dispersion modeling requires hourly-averaged data, which represents the entire <br /> hour being modeled, and not only a snapshot taken in one moment during the hour. <br /> In addition, data collected at Fresno Airport are not subject to the system <br /> accuracies required for meteorological data collected for air dispersion modeling. <br /> The U.S. EPA recommends that meteorological monitoring for dispersion modeling <br /> use equipment that are sensitive enough to measure all conditions necessary to <br /> verify compliance with the national ambient air quality standards and Prevention of <br /> Significant Deterioration C'PSD") increments (and these same conditions apply for <br /> risk assessments). For example, low wind speeds (down to 1.0 meter per second) are <br /> usually associated with peak air quality impacts- this is because modeled impacts <br /> are inversely proportional to wind speed. Following U.S. EPA guidance, wind speed <br /> measuring devices (anemometers) should have a starting threshold of 0.5 meter per <br /> second or less 76 The wind speed measurements should be accurate to within plus or <br /> minus 0.2 meter per second, with a measurement resolution of 0.1 meter per <br /> second 77 <br /> 74 Oke T.R.,Boundary Layer Climates,Halsted Press,1978,pp.240-241. <br /> 75 USEPA,Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, EPA-454/R- — <br /> 99-05,February 2000,p.4-2. <br /> 76 Id.,p.5-2. <br /> 77 Id.,p.5-1. <br /> 48 <br />