Laserfiche WebLink
_ 3.Response to Comments <br /> Response to Comment 1-13 <br /> Commenter asks that the Iable 4.4-3 reference on page 4.4-7 to the Florida Department of <br /> Transportation tables be revised to use the Highway CapacityMamial HCS2000 methodology, as <br /> the County does not recognize the Florida Department of Transportation methodology. <br /> The road segment analysis in the revised traffic impact study was prepared utilizing the HCS+ <br /> Ir computer program, which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. <br /> Response to Comment 1-14 <br /> Commenter states that, referring to page 4.4-15, the freeway agreement between the County and <br /> Caltrans does not include an interchange at Koster Road, and therefore, Caltrans has the <br /> Lauthority to close this intersection at their discretion. The commenter requests that the discussion of <br /> the Koster Road intersection include the information that the intersection ofSRI32 and Koster <br /> road will likely be removed with the construction of SR 132 as an expressway and later freeway. <br /> I <br /> Haul Route 2 has been eliminated from consideration. Therefore,no taming movements would <br /> occur at Koster and SR 132. <br /> Response to Comment 1-15 <br /> Commenter requests that the statement in Mitigation Measure 4.4.4 "Upgrades and replacements <br /> r, will be completed to the Traffic Index identified in Table 4.45 unless the need for a different <br /> Traffic Index is indicated by future traffic counts"to include the text at the end of the statement <br /> j, "or as otherwise determined by the County." <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.4.4 has been revised. <br /> ` Response to Comment 1-16 <br /> Commenter states that the bridges along Koster Road may not be intended for such high-volume, <br /> I heavy load truck traffic, and suggests bridge improvement mitigation. <br /> Haul Routes 1 and 3 use Koster Road only for access to the site(south of Blewett Road).No <br /> bridges are located on this segment. <br /> L <br /> Letter J. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control <br /> District <br /> Response to Comment J-1 <br /> Commenter states that the project would contribute to the overall decline in air quality of the San <br /> 1 Joaquin Palley Air Basin due to the constriction activities in preparation of the site, and ongoing <br /> �. <br /> traffic and other operational emissions. <br /> Comment noted. The DEIR identifies several significant and unavoidable impacts related to <br /> air quality. <br /> LCemex Vernalis Quarry Murine and Reclamation Project 3-37 ESA1203015 <br /> Final Environmental Impact Report June 2008 <br /> L <br />