Laserfiche WebLink
Analysis <br /> Background <br /> On June 17, 1988, the Planning Division approved Site Approval Application No. SA-88-39 for a grain <br /> storage facility. The project included four grain storage pads, an office, and shop. The existing grain <br /> storage facility is not a part of this project. <br /> This item, which would ordinarily be processed at the staff level, is being referred to the Planning <br /> Commission because of neighborhood opposition. <br /> Facility Operations <br /> The agricultural by-products consist of tomato pumice, grape pumice, potatoes, pumpkins, parsley, corn, <br /> rice, and almonds. The proposed facility will employ four employees. From June to October, hours of <br /> operation are from 6:00 a.m.to 8:00 p.m. daily. From November through May, hours of operation are <br /> from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Agricultural by-products are preprocessed off-site to remove excess moisture <br /> and then hauled to the project site. Upon arrival, the materials are unloaded and thinly spread on the <br /> paved surfaces (drying beds). The materials are solar dried and then stockpiled for approximately four <br /> days until hauled off-site. <br /> Lot Line Adjustments <br /> On December 3, 2002, the Community Development Department approved Lot Line Adjustment <br /> application No. PA-0200529,which included adjusting the property lines of the subject parcel. The Notice <br /> of Lot Line Adjustment was recorded but title was not transferred reflecting the adjusted lot line <br /> configuration. On October 20, 2006, the Community Development Department approved Lot Line <br /> Adjustment application No. PA-0600541 and adjusted the property lines to the configuration depicted on <br /> the site plan. The Notice of Lot Line Adjustment was recorded but title was not transferred reflecting the <br /> adjusted lot line configuration. As a Condition of Approval, new recorded deeds shall be submitted <br /> reflecting the lot line adjustments (PA-0200529 and PA-0600541, consecutively)prior to the issuance of <br /> the grading permit. <br /> Neighborhood Opposition <br /> The Community Development Department received seven letters in opposition from the surrounding <br /> neighbors. The letters expressed concerns regarding the project's impacts on odor, noise, air quality, <br /> groundwater contamination, traffic, and land use. <br /> Odor: Neighbors are concerned about the odor generated from the operations. As a Condition of <br /> Approval, the Environmental Health Department is requiring the operator to develop and implement an <br /> Odor Impact Management Plan. Implementation of the Odor Impact Management Plan will ensure odor <br /> impacts are reduced to less than significant. <br /> Air Quality: Neighbors are concerned about the impacts to air quality. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution <br /> Control District submitted a letter dated July 11, 2012 and indicated project specific emissions of criteria <br /> pollutants are not expected to exceed District significance thresholds of 10 tons/year NOX, 10 ton/year <br /> ROG, and 15 tons/year PM10. Therefore, the District concludes that project specific criteria pollutant <br /> emissions would have no significant adverse impact on air quality. Additionally, implementation of the <br /> Odor Impact Management Plan will ensure impacts to air quality are reduced to less than significant. <br /> San Joaquin County PA-1200122/Gilton <br /> Community Development Page 3 <br />