Laserfiche WebLink
Agenda Item 11.A <br /> April 19, 2005 <br /> Page 2 <br /> annexation could not proceed. LAFCO did receive valid protests from over 50% of the <br /> 265 registered voters, thus the annexation application did fail. <br /> The construction documents for the sewer line are nearing completion. However, staff <br /> recently learned that there is no funding available in the State's Revolving Loan Fund. <br /> The Finance Director has reviewed other possible funding sources and has concluded <br /> that none are feasible without significant additional cost. It now appears that the <br /> construction of the sewer line will be delayed at least a year, which will mean that the <br /> assessment will not be levied this fall as planned. <br /> The City has several options as to how to proceed: <br /> 1. The City could wait one year and submit the same application for annexation to <br /> LAFCO. This does not appear to be a viable option, as there is no reason to <br /> think that the vote would be any different in a year. <br /> 2. The City could, by policy, consider no further annexations proposals regarding <br /> Larch Clover at this time or until such time as the infrastructure master plans are <br /> updated and treatment capacities are analyzed. However, following the <br /> annexation vote, City staff has been contacted by numerous property owners, <br /> primarily in the vicinity of Tracy Boulevard and Larch Road, Corral Hollow Road <br /> and Larch Road, and Clover Road west of the current City limit and south of 1- <br /> 205 indicating their interest in annexation. <br /> 3. The City could consider a single application from those property owners that <br /> want to annex. This alternative would likely include property owners that don't <br /> want to annex in order to have a map that makes geographic sense, but the <br /> annexation would have to be structured to ensure that the protest would not be <br /> more than 25% of the registered voters. <br /> 4. The City could consider individual annexation requests upon application. <br /> A key factor in how the City proceeds is how San Joaquin County wishes to proceed <br /> with regard to future annexations in the Larch Clover area. On April 8, 2005 Mayor <br /> Bilbrey and City staff met with Supervisor Leroy Ornallas to discuss the options. <br /> The conclusion reached was that, with the concurrence of the City Council, the City <br /> would respond to requests for annexation from property owners, but not on a parcel-by- <br /> parcel basis. There would not be a City initiated effort. The actual shape of the <br /> annexation area could be irregular depending on which owners propose to annex. <br /> Basically, the "ends" of the Larch Clover area, and possibly the south side of 1-205 are <br /> considered the most likely areas for annexation as noted above. <br /> With City Council's concurrence, staff would send a letter to property owners and <br /> conduct a meeting to inform the property owners of the proposed approach, and to <br /> determine which property owners are interested in annexation. It will also be necessary <br /> to discuss alternative approaches to any funding of infrastructure capacity and analysis <br /> and the establishment of impact fees for the entire area. <br />