My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004272
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LARCH
>
11515
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0300116
>
SU0004272
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:36 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:47:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004272
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0300116
STREET_NUMBER
11515
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/17/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11515 W LARCH RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LARCH\11515\PA-0300116\SU0004272\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LARCH\11515\PA-0300116\SU0004272\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LARCH\11515\PA-0300116\SU0004272\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LARCH\11515\PA-0300116\SU0004272\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agenda Item 11.A <br /> April 19, 2005 <br /> Page 2 <br /> annexation could not proceed. LAFCO did receive valid protests from over 50% of the <br /> 265 registered voters, thus the annexation application did fail. <br /> The construction documents for the sewer line are nearing completion. However, staff <br /> recently learned that there is no funding available in the State's Revolving Loan Fund. <br /> The Finance Director has reviewed other possible funding sources and has concluded <br /> that none are feasible without significant additional cost. It now appears that the <br /> construction of the sewer line will be delayed at least a year, which will mean that the <br /> assessment will not be levied this fall as planned. <br /> The City has several options as to how to proceed: <br /> 1. The City could wait one year and submit the same application for annexation to <br /> LAFCO. This does not appear to be a viable option, as there is no reason to <br /> think that the vote would be any different in a year. <br /> 2. The City could, by policy, consider no further annexations proposals regarding <br /> Larch Clover at this time or until such time as the infrastructure master plans are <br /> updated and treatment capacities are analyzed. However, following the <br /> annexation vote, City staff has been contacted by numerous property owners, <br /> primarily in the vicinity of Tracy Boulevard and Larch Road, Corral Hollow Road <br /> and Larch Road, and Clover Road west of the current City limit and south of 1- <br /> 205 indicating their interest in annexation. <br /> 3. The City could consider a single application from those property owners that <br /> want to annex. This alternative would likely include property owners that don't <br /> want to annex in order to have a map that makes geographic sense, but the <br /> annexation would have to be structured to ensure that the protest would not be <br /> more than 25% of the registered voters. <br /> 4. The City could consider individual annexation requests upon application. <br /> A key factor in how the City proceeds is how San Joaquin County wishes to proceed <br /> with regard to future annexations in the Larch Clover area. On April 8, 2005 Mayor <br /> Bilbrey and City staff met with Supervisor Leroy Ornallas to discuss the options. <br /> The conclusion reached was that, with the concurrence of the City Council, the City <br /> would respond to requests for annexation from property owners, but not on a parcel-by- <br /> parcel basis. There would not be a City initiated effort. The actual shape of the <br /> annexation area could be irregular depending on which owners propose to annex. <br /> Basically, the "ends" of the Larch Clover area, and possibly the south side of 1-205 are <br /> considered the most likely areas for annexation as noted above. <br /> With City Council's concurrence, staff would send a letter to property owners and <br /> conduct a meeting to inform the property owners of the proposed approach, and to <br /> determine which property owners are interested in annexation. It will also be necessary <br /> to discuss alternative approaches to any funding of infrastructure capacity and analysis <br /> and the establishment of impact fees for the entire area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.