Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes 12 April 19, 2005 <br /> annexation because of changes it might bring to the area including the cost of <br /> new public facilities. <br /> In the Fall of 2003, the majority of Larch-Clover area property owners voted in <br /> favor of forming an assessment district to pay for sewer lines to be installed to <br /> serve the existing development in the area, and for the cost of one Equivalent <br /> Consumer Unit (ECU) for those parcels that had an existing use. Vacant <br /> parcels were assessed only for the cost of the pipes. It was anticipated the <br /> City would obtain a very low interest rate loan (about 2.6%) from the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board (California Environmental Protection Agency) <br /> that would be paid back from annual assessments levied on the property <br /> owners. No bonds were to be issued. The state loan was to be for a period of <br /> 20 years. The cost of the improvements is estimated to be about $5.3 million <br /> with an annual debt service of approximately $343,000. The annual assess- <br /> ment for one house on a typical Larch Clover lot is approximately $1,625 per <br /> year. <br /> Assessment districts are formed by a simple majority vote of the property owners <br /> of those property owners submitting ballots with the vote weighted based on the <br /> dollars to be assessed. In contrast, the annexation of an inhabited area such as <br /> Larch Clover is potentially subject to a vote of the registered voters in the area. <br /> An annexation also requires the approval of the Local Agency Formation <br /> Commission (LAFCO). Due to the differences in procedure, the vote on an <br /> assessment district and a vote on an annexation of an inhabited area may not <br /> have the same result, which was the case with the Larch Clover area. <br /> On January 21 LAFCO held a public hearing and approved, subject to a <br /> potential protest hearing, the City's proposal to annex the Larch Clover area. <br /> Several people spoke in support of the annexation, and several people spoke <br /> in opposition. On February 23, 2005, LAFCO conducted a "protest hearing." <br /> However, since LAFCO received valid protests from over 50% of the 265 <br /> registered voters, the annexation application failed. <br /> The construction documents for the sewer line are nearing completion. <br /> However, staff recently learned that there is no funding available in the State's <br /> Revolving Loan Fund. The Finance Director has reviewed other possible <br /> funding sources and has concluded that none are feasible without significant <br /> additional cost. It now appears that the construction of the sewer line will be <br /> delayed at least a year, which means that the assessment will not be levied this <br /> fall as planned. <br /> The City has several options as to how to proceed: <br /> 1. The City could wait one year and submit the same application for <br /> annexation to LAFCO. This does not appear to be a viable option, as there is <br /> no reason to think that the vote would be any different in a year. <br /> 2. The City could, by policy, consider no further annexation proposals <br /> regarding Larch Clover at this time, or until such time as the infrastructure <br /> master plans are updated and treatment capacities are analyzed. However, <br /> following the annexation vote, City staff has been contacted by numerous <br /> property owners, primarily in the vicinity of Tracy Boulevard and Larch Road, <br />