Laserfiche WebLink
SOIL EXPLORATION REPORT: <br /> A truck mounted drill rig was employed to drill to 25' in search of a stratum which could be <br /> tested for percolation. Approximately 10 holes were: drilled on the three parcels.No satisfactory <br /> layer of soil was found. The top 18" of clay support the grasses grown for pasture. The deeper <br /> the hole the more difficult the drilling. On Parcel 2, the drill could not reach a depth beyond 17'. <br /> A thin layer of dense cl.si.sd was located at 6'but very dense. Shallow tests were made at the 36- <br /> 42" depth on all three parcels. No evidence of a satisfactory layer was found on Parcel I & 3. On <br /> Parcel 2 the shallow hole was clay with some gravel mixed in. <br /> PERCOLATION TESTING <br /> On 5-8-02, percolation tests were made on Parcels I and 3. On 6-21-02 the percolation test <br /> was conducted on Parcel 2. The tests were performed in accordance with the requirements of the <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. The field percolation test data is included <br /> in this report. The tests on 5-8-02 failed to meet the percolation test requirements. On 6-21-02 the <br /> shallow test hole passed the percolation test by meeting the minimum rate of 1" per hour. All the <br /> tests were conducted by a representative of Earnest F. Smith &Associates, Mr. Walt Curtis. Mr. <br /> Curtis is a Licensed Civil Engineer in the State of California. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The percolation test results indicate the soil tested on Parcels 1 & 3 are not conducive to a <br /> percolation rate that is in compliance with the existing EHD requirement for residential <br /> development using a standard system. Parcel 2 tests do permit a standard system to be installed. <br /> The size of the parcels present ample space for a leach field that is engineered for the type of soil <br /> conditions existing at the site on Parcel I & 3. On Parcel 2 there must be some selection on the <br /> area chosen for the leach field. The vernal pools must be avoided. The highest ground on Parcel 2 <br /> was selected for the test location. This may be some distance from the residence and may not be <br /> acceptable to the owner. By selection near the residence equal soil conditions could probably be <br /> found. <br />