SU0005998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Y a ' V Thomas T. Morris 1119 Stanton Way Stockton, CA 95207 ,A#e San Joaquin County April 22, 2006 Community Development Department 1810 East Hazelton Street Stockton, CA 95205 ATTENTION: Mo Hatef OPPOSITION TO USE PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER PA-0600193 This letter has been written to inform you of my opposition to Use Permit Application Number PA-0600193 (UP), a use permit application for child care services for 30 children that includes a request to reduce the number of parking spaces. This is for the property located at 1104 W. Lincoln Road. I oppose this application for the following reasons. Child care services for thirty children at the proposed site would be a determent to the tranquility of the surrounding residential neighborhood on all sides, day care for thirty children is not compatible with the size of the residential home, parking problems with the related pick-ups and drop offs will cause an adverse impact on Lincoln Road as well as the sidewalks near the front of the location, and this type of business use in a low density residential neighborhood reduces the property values for the surrounding homeowners. This type of use should be in a semi-commercial area, not in this residential neighborhood. It simply should not be allowed. Child care services for thirty children at the proposed site would be a determent to the tranquility of the surrounding residential neighborhood on all sides. This business use would negatively impact the enjoyment and quality of life, particularly for the surrounding residences. There are some working homeowners who must work at night and sleep during the day. The noise and activity created by the applicant's use would not only disturb the adjacent residents, but also the tranquility of the homeowners in the backyards of the surrounding area. Day care for thirty children is not compatible with the size of the applicant's residential home. To have adequate restroom facilities and other necessary furnishings would require the residence to be turned into a commercial type of facility. It simply is absurd to allow that much, and that type, of activity at the applicant's residential location.