Laserfiche WebLink
lei:r. http:;/zimbra/zimbratilv'prinhnessage?id=16477 <br /> Thank you, <br /> Megan A. <br /> (209) 468-3144; meaquirre@sjgov.org <br /> From: "Joe Salzman" <Icsd@softcom.net> <br /> To: "Megan Aguirre" <meaquirre@sjgov.org> <br /> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 1:12:01 PM <br /> Subject: Re: PA-1400154 (GP),PA-1400155 (ZR), & PA-1400156 (AP) <br /> Hi Megan, <br /> The detachment of the above parcels is not a requirement at this time. Once the <br /> parcels have been re-designated the District Board of Directors may require the parcels <br /> to be removed from the District sphere of influence since the acreage factors in with <br /> how much water and sewer facilities the District needs for future growth per LAFCO's <br /> requirements. We are currently in the process of removing an existing parcel elsewhere <br /> in the District. My thought was that these parcels could be lumped together. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Joe Salzman <br /> District Manager <br /> Lockeford CSD <br /> From: Megan Aguirre <br /> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:35 AM <br /> To: Joe Salzman <br /> Subject: Re: PA-1400154 (GP),PA-1400155 (ZR), & PA-1400156 (AP) <br /> Dear Joe, <br /> Based on your email below, is the Lockeford CSC requiring that our applicant detach the <br /> project area from the CSD, or is this just a recommendation? If your agency is requiring <br /> detachment, 1 will have the applicant contact you right away to find out how to <br /> proceed. At this point, I believe they have only communicated with LAFCO. I also <br /> contacted LAFCO, and they indicated that they would expect to see the CSD take the <br /> lead in detaching the property through them. Please confirm whether detachment is a <br /> requirement. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Megan A. <br /> (209) 468-3144; meaquirre@siqov.org <br /> 2 of 1 11/19/2014 11:49 AM <br />