Laserfiche WebLink
City of Galt <br /> In a memo dated November 10, 2005, the City of Galt expressed opposition to the proposed development <br /> for the following reasons: <br /> Statements 1 & 5: "The project is proximate to the City of Galt. As such, residents of the project site are <br /> likely to use the city facilities without payment of mitigation to the city to off-set impacts." "The proposed <br /> subdivision will potentially impact traffic projections in the City." <br /> Response: The project will increase the number of vehicles trips on State Route 99, East and West <br /> Frontage Roads, Liberty Road and Lower Sacramento Road due to the proposed number of <br /> residential buildings. A traffic study was completed August 2005 by T.Y. Lin International/CCS, <br /> which determined that the amount of traffic generated as a result of this project is considered to <br /> have a significant impact on the existing level of services (LOS). The study recommend <br /> improvements that would result in acceptable (LOS). To reduce the impacts to less than <br /> significant the Department of Public Works recommends the following conditions: <br /> The applicantldeveloper shall pay a "fairshare"contribution for the improvements of the following <br /> intersections, prior to recording of the Final Map: <br /> (a) $15,713.00 for the improvements to Liberty Road and Lower Sacramento Road. <br /> (b) $2,970.00 for the improvements to Cost Road and Lower Sacramento Road. <br /> (c) $34,899.00 for improvements to Liberty Road and N. State Route 99 West Frontage Road. <br /> (d) $18,234.00 for improvements to Liberty Road and N. State Route 99 East Frontage Road. <br /> Also, Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees will be required when parcels are developed and payable at <br /> time of the building permit application. <br /> Statement 2: "The density of this agriculture-residential project is too high given the lack of nearby public <br /> services in this location including municipal water, sewer, road maintenance, police, fire protection and <br /> recreational facilities.""It will also be growth inducing." <br /> Response: The parcels have a General Plan designation and Zoning of RIR and R-R (Rural <br /> Residential), respectively. The application is an appropriate land use request because the project <br /> is consistent with the zoning. The average lot size is greater than one acre and the entire project <br /> area[excluding the "designated remainder']is 75.08 acres, which results in a density of less than <br /> 1 du/ga. The "designated remainder" is not currently proposed for development. All other <br /> development requirements contained in the Development Title and County standards are <br /> satisfied. <br /> Statement 3: 'The proposed subdivision will create an additional load on already limited ground water <br /> supply." <br /> Response: As required by the Public Works Department a Master Plan for a water system shall be <br /> prepared prior to approval of the Final Map. The system shall provide adequate domestic and fire <br /> water supply in conformance to the requirements of the County fire warden and the local Fire <br /> District. Also, water meters shall be installed on all water services. (Board of Supervisors Order B- <br /> 91-650) Additionally, a test well conforming to the requirements of the Development Title shall be <br /> approved prior to final approval of improvement plans . The Initial Study did not indicate substantial <br /> San Joaquin County PA-0400074\Gude) <br /> Community Development Page 5 <br />