My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002960
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
9900
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-96-04
>
SU0002960
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:34 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 11:10:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002960
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-96-04
STREET_NUMBER
9900
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
11/6/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9900 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\9900\SA-96-04\SU0002960\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\9900\SA-96-04\SU0002960\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\L\LOWER SACRAMENTO\9900\SA-96-04\SU0002960\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORDER NO. R5-2002-0225 -2- <br /> ALPINE PACKING COMPANY,INC. <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> to one of two sumps for settling, and then it is piped to the wastewater treatment ponds. There <br /> are four ponds in series. Wastewater is pumped from the last pond to a 14-acre land treatment <br /> unit. Because the ponds are maintained at relatively constant levels, there is little available <br /> storage provided in the ponds. The lack of storage combined with the lack of evapotranspiration <br /> in the winter months indicates wastewater is being applied to land at inappropriate times during <br /> the winter months. The Discharger is required to perforin an evaluation of the storage capacity <br /> and construct improvements if needed. <br /> The treated wastewater is applied to a 14.0-acre land treatment unit. Approximately 66-acres are <br /> available for land treatment but were not proposed for use in the Report of Waste Discharge. This <br /> Order allows the additional land treatment unit(s)to be designated for use upon submittal of <br /> technical reports and approval of the Executive Officer. The Discharger plans to flood irrigate the <br /> land treatment unit; use of sprinklers to apply the water is acceptable if the discharge is performed <br /> in accordance with the WDRs. <br /> Groundwater Quality <br /> Groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site in 2001. Based on three groundwater <br /> monitoring events, groundwater downgradient of the land treatment unit contains elevated <br /> concentrations of dissolved solids. This Order requires installation of additional wells, an <br /> evaluation of groundwater quality, and if requested by.the Executive Officer, a Mitigation Plan <br /> to address groundwater degradation. <br /> The Discharger has objected to the use of monitoring wells located upgradient and downgradient <br /> of the land treatment unit as being unrepresentative of present conditions. Staff agree that the <br /> previous discharge of larger amounts of wastewater may have degraded the groundwater below <br /> the land treatment units. However, it is noted that the wastewater being discharged presently, <br /> with the exception of TKN, possesses higher concentrations of dissolved solids than wastewater <br /> discharged prior to February 1999. To better evaluate any impact on groundwater quality the <br /> wastewater application is having, characterization and monitoring of vadose zone quality is <br /> required. The Discharger is required to prepare a vadose zone workplan that recommends <br /> investigation and monitoring techniques. The purpose of the monitoring is to determine whether <br /> the land treatment units are sufficiently treating the wastewater such that the underlying <br /> groundwater will not be degraded. <br /> The Discharger has stated the groundwater gradient may have reversed direction as measured in <br /> the 8 July 2002 groundwater monitoring event. However, the 21 July 2002 groundwater <br /> monitoring report prepared by Fall Creek Engineering, Inc. states, "The water level recorded for <br /> MW4 proved to be suspect." In the July 2002 sample event, data from only two of the four wells <br /> is considered reliable enough to determine groundwater depth. Groundwater gradient cannot be <br /> determined without three accurate data points. This indicates the depth to groundwater <br /> measurement data is questionable for the July 2002 monitoring event when the gradient reversal <br /> was reported. <br /> CAMy Docurwntsl Wyels50'BrienVW0.doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.