Laserfiche WebLink
The capacities of the on-site soils-were analyzedfor 1.)The ability to accept anticipated future <br /> _ wastewater effluent flows, 2.)To assess the characteristics of the on-site soil to mitigate:nitrate <br /> 911 <br /> impact, and 3 }To quantify nitrate impact potential to.thc underlying,gi-oundwater from percolating <br /> effluent. This:was accomplished by the referenced testing and-loadrr g calculations. <br /> • Although it is an EHD requirement-that any on-site well fora project.must be sampled and analyzed <br /> for specific constituents,there. . s.no on-siteirrigation or damest;c well to sample for these <br /> Studies. <br /> • Wastewater flow volumes emanating from the proposed project have been formulated based upon r: <br /> information provided by Mr. Amin Mahmood. Therefore,the nitrate loading calculations are..based <br /> on these flow volumes. <br /> The soils testing and investigation has found the indigenous surface soilsunder,the.test.location, which was. <br /> in the northeast triangular-shaped corner of.the property,to_contairn a predorriinately fine-grained clay, <br /> material. Although the test results show acceptable permeability in the deeper.soiis,'management of. <br /> wastewater effluent by the surface soils down to 42 inches°soils will;only slightly occur as evidenced by the <br /> unacceptable percolation rates. From -9 to l l feet exists a poorly-graded clayey,.silty very fine sand. <br /> From -12 to '-20 feet is a silty clay. From -20 to -22 feet is a silty fine sand, and from --22 to 25 feet is a 5 <br /> silty, clayey fine sand. The soils at -9 to:-11 feet below grade possess percolative-capacityas demonstrated <br /> by an EHD unofficial percolation test conducted at.10J feet below grade:. The.EHD official deep perc test <br /> at 22 feet also indicates acceptable percolation:' <br /> II. SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY- FINDINGS <br /> A. SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING STUDY AREA INFORMATION <br /> SSS§ 11. Surrounding land use to the immediate north is the East Bay Municipal Utilities District, ,t� <br /> (E.B.M.U.D.), a motel and low density housing. To the east is also very.low density housing, grazing land. <br /> To the west is Highway 99 and high density housing on Citywater and sewer." South of the project is rural <br /> housing with open land and commercial property. The land'-use referenced is illustrated on the San_Joaquin t <br /> County Parcel Viewer Maps found in Appendix A. <br /> SSS§ 3.1, 3.2,3.3, 3.4, 3.5,3.6, 3.7, 6.& Applications-,on microfiche files with the EHD reveal that <br /> there have been approximately 17 permits issued for.repairs/replacements/additions to existing <br /> systems within the one-half mile study area on'the Highway 99 Frontage Road. This can be <br /> considered a large number of permits for the study.area°and indicates marginal soil permeability, <br /> especially in the top surface soils which is characteristic of the Morada area. From observations <br /> made by EHD, commercial facilities-on conventional septic syste -along the Highway 99 � <br /> Corridor, particularly in the Morada area; have been.problematic. /4p'p!�-wl- 1�� <br /> The project site has level terrain; consequently, there will-be no need to incorporate design <br /> considerations for slopes for the futu're-disposal area. Under EHD requirements and regulations, a <br /> mound system for effluent disposal would not be allowed for this future project even though tight <br /> clayey surface soils exist. <br /> 2' <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />