My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Munn 8 Perkins Quarry Excavation Permit <br /> • Air Quality impacts including odor from the asphalt batch plant and dust from project <br /> operations. <br /> • Noise impacts from nighttime operations, including noise from haul trucks. <br /> • Transportation impacts, including operational impacts to local roadways and <br /> intersections. <br /> • Visual impacts from nighttime lighting. <br /> Issues Considered and Found Not To Be Significant 0 <br /> An EIR shall focus on the significant impacts to the environment (Guidelines §15143). Issues <br /> identified during the scoping process as not being significant are discussed below. The following <br /> issues were identified by the County during the scoping process as not significant and;therefore, <br /> were not evaluated further in this DEIR, as discussed in more detail below. <br /> • Agriculture and Forestry <br /> • Biological Resources <br /> • Cultural Resources a <br /> • Geology and Soils <br /> • Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> • Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> • Land Use Planning <br /> • Mineral Resources <br /> • Population and Housing(see Section 5.1.2 for a discussion of Growth Inducement) <br /> • Public Services <br /> • Recreation <br /> • Utilities and Public Facilities <br /> Alternatives to the Proposed Project <br /> The purpose of the alternatives analysis in an EIR is to describe a range of reasonable alternatives <br /> to the project that could feasibly attain the objectives of the project, and to evaluate the comparative <br /> merits of the alternatives(CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a)). <br /> The following alternatives are discussed in Chapter 4, Alternatives: <br /> • Alternative 1 —No Project Alternative <br /> • Alternative 2—West Only Haul Route Alternative <br /> • Alternative 3—East Only Haul Route Alternative <br /> Alternative 2(West Only Haul Route)is designated in the EIR as the environmentally superior <br /> alternative. <br /> Munn&Perkins Quarry Excavation Permit ES-2 ESA 1211086 <br /> Draft DR . ' April 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.