My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007300
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
RIVER
>
26292
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-89-0002
>
SU0007300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 3:08:38 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 9:06:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007300
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
QX-89-0002
STREET_NUMBER
26292
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
RIVER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
APN
24722019
ENTERED_DATE
7/29/2008 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26292 E RIVER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/28/2008 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\R\RIVER\26292\QX-890002\SU0007300\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
629
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Munn&Perkins Quarry Excavation Permit <br /> a <br /> processing and 0.0049 lb/ton of material for asphalt silo)were based on information contained in <br /> a North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality report entitled Salisbury Air Quality Monitoring <br /> Study.Analysis done by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District concluded that emissions <br /> from the production of rubberized asphalt are not significantly different than those from the <br /> production of conventional asphalt(BAAQMD,2002). The rubber additives in rubberized asphalt <br /> are not processed at a temperature high enough to cause the rubber to smoke or burn. <br /> The AERMOD dispersion model (Version 6.1.0)was used for the modeling analysis. AERMOD <br /> is the USEPA and SJVAPCD preferred dispersion model. It predicts both short-and Iong-term <br /> average concentrations. The model was executed using the regulatory default options(stack-tip <br /> downwash, buoyancy-induced dispersion, final plume rise),default wind speed profile categories, {� <br /> default potential temperature gradients, and no pollutant decay. Based on observation of the area <br /> surrounding the project site,rural dispersion coefficients we're applied in the analysis.Hourly emission <br /> scalars were applied accounting to the source operational schedule(i.e., 9 pm through 5 am)to <br /> account for the night-time emissions.Receptors were placed at locations within all residential uses <br /> surrounding the project site.Receptors were positioned as flagpole receptors at a height of 1.8 meters <br /> above the ground(typical breathing height). Surface meteorological data and upper air meteorological <br /> data from the Stockton station were obtained from the SJVAPCD and were used for the modeling <br /> analysis. The 5-year data set from 2005 to 2009 was used. The asphalt plant was treated as a point <br /> source with a release height of 42 feet,an average exhaust temperature of 101 degrees F, an exhaust <br /> flow rate of 27,104 dry standard cubic feet per minute,and a stack diameter of 77 inches.The asphalt <br /> silos were treated as volume sources with a release height of 65.6 feet and a horizontal dimension <br /> of 13 feet. <br /> Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> Impact 3.3.1: The project could create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number O <br /> of people. This impact would be Less than Significant. <br /> The SJVAPCD has determined minimal buffer distances for some common types of facilities that <br /> have been known to produce odors.For an asphalt batch plant,this distance is one mile. However, <br /> the asphalt plant at the project site is located less than one mile from many residences,the closest <br /> of which is about 0.3 miles(1,600 feet)north of the plant.Thus,dispersion modeling was conducted <br /> to evaluate concentrations of H2S and potential odor impacts at the nearest sensitive residential LLLIII <br /> receptors.Dispersion modeling analysis shows a potential maximum 1-Hour H2S concentration of <br /> 20 4g/m3. The California ambient air quality standard for H2S is 42 ug/m3. Thus,the project is not <br /> expected to result in ground-level concentration known to produce odor impacts4. Therefore,the <br /> impact of odors from the project is expected to be less than significant. In addition,the applicant <br /> will utilize a masking agent when rubberized asphalt is produced to minimize odors. <br /> Mitigation:None required. <br /> 4 According to the ARB,"breathing 112S at levels above the standard will result in exposure to a very disagreeable f 7 <br /> odor.In 1984,an ARB committee concluded that the ambient standard for H2S is adequate to protect public health <br /> and to significantly reduce odor annoyance."(ARB,2009b) <br /> 0 <br /> Munn&Perkins Quarry Excavation Permit 3.3-18 F$A1211086 <br /> Draft OR <br /> Apn12011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.