Laserfiche WebLink
_ _ - - <br /> 4.Alternatives <br /> TABLE 4-1 <br /> COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> Alternative 2: Alternative 3: <br /> Environmental Impact Alternative 1:No West Haul Route East Haul <br /> (Prior to Mitigation) Proposed Project Project Alt. Route Alt. <br /> 3.1. Visual and LI htin <br /> 3.1.1: Implementation of the project has the potential to create a new source of substantial light or glare which PS NI- PS PS <br /> would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. <br /> 77, <br /> 3.2. Traffc and Circulation s.. <br /> y.•. <br /> 3.2.1: The Project would increase traffic volumes on area roadways. LS NI- LS L5 <br /> ..-. <br /> 3.3 Air Quah and climate Chan e y <br /> 3.3.3:The project could create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. LS NI- LS LS <br /> 3.4_Noise ".. «....�. <br /> _:. <br /> 3.4.1.Project asphalt plant operations will add to the noise environment in the project vianity <br /> _. LS NI ------PS PS <br /> 3.4.2:Off-site project haul truck traffic will add to the noise environment in the project vicinity. PS NI- PS- P5- <br /> Legend: PS Potentially significant LS Less than significant -Impacts less than proposed project +Impacts greater than proposed project <br /> Munn&Perkins Quarry Excavation Permit 4-7 - ESA!211066 <br /> April 2011 <br /> Draft EIR <br />