Laserfiche WebLink
Mwm&Peon Quarry Enava&n Pe mit <br /> Response to Comment 1-22: <br /> `I hz commenter states that the noise section ol`the project DEIR "Utili es Moth the Bullard <br /> Acoustical Consultanls, Inc. (BAC) technical noise analysis, and the Deer reviex%/contnten(s .\e <br /> [.l.C`. Brennan cS Atisociatesj have prc%'iousl� provided oil the BAC stttdk <br /> In addition to the BAC technical noise analysis (August 21 2010) and the peer revic\y/comments <br /> b% 1.C. Brennan t_ Associates (Octoher 13, 21)10), the project DE!R noise section relied on <br /> infc€t'ntatia:sn conlained in BACs ntznto of October 22. 2010. !his inforrnation is referenced in the <br /> project D1'_1R noise section. <br /> Response to Comment 1-23: <br /> The comnlcmer que"'tions tllL accurac,, oflhc arttKoH noise level measurements and analysis of <br /> tilt project asphalt plant noise cxposurc due to the measurement locations. lack ofni�Jtttime and <br /> relercncc rnca,'urerneW of the project agkah plant. and lack of computer noise exposure <br /> rntrdcling efln Rn the project asphalt plant (noise contours). <br /> 13tdlard :Acoustical Consultants. Inc. (BAC') eompletcd additional niolttinte noise level utca5urcment <br /> at the closest residential rceciyns on August I6-17. -101 I and August 22-26- 2011 (see report of <br /> September 1. 201 11 1 hest Qhttinle rneasurenlents included operation of the prujecl asphalt plant. <br /> kiAIlts Of the ntcasureIII ents conlinli. based on their analysis of the measurernent data. that project <br /> stsphalt plant noise exposure dial not exceed the applicable-15 (IB L,criterion at the closest residence. <br /> Addhhmalb� BAC complctcd acoustical modeling, ofthc pri ject asphalt plant using SomPI:AN. <br /> Ilk nwddbg conlirmed Ihat noise Horn the project asphalt plant at the closest residential receivers <br /> is not expected to exceed 45 dB L.,, The Septamher 1. 201 1 BAC report has been included as <br /> Appendix A oflhc Final I:IR. <br /> Response to Comment 1-24: <br /> The commenter has pointed out error, in the noise section ofthe project DF.IR regarding, the <br /> ambient noise measurement dates and a typo rcgarding measured ma`;iniurn noise levels. <br /> I...he [nea,�W'cntent da(e:; and mol e Ieye.l error, have been corrected. <br /> Response to Comment 1-25: <br /> The conunenter questions ;ylty the dy-Not average ambient noise level (I q,) measurement <br /> mots "ov not included in the project DFIk noise section. <br /> A unt111al) ofineasured day-nigi t a.yerage noise levels (L;j recorded by Bollard llCousAN " <br /> C.`onsulmits, Inc. (RAC) durQ, the ambient riokQ level surveys of September 28. 2008 to October- <br /> ?, 2008 am presented in Table AQ of the project DFIR noise section. <br /> Response to Comment 1-26: <br /> J he conurnenter questions tic lack of noise leN QI contours l'or the project asphalt plant.. <br /> ,, F a -, 3-14 <br /> _�� EiSA121iG <br /> - - Seprer^ber z0�i <br />