My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002670
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
8751
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-99-41
>
SU0002670
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:48:10 PM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:27:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002670
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-99-41
STREET_NUMBER
8751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
VICTOR
ENTERED_DATE
10/31/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8751 E HWY 12
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\HWY 12\8751\SA-99-41\SU0002670\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br /> for <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY ORDER <br /> FOR <br /> DOLE FRESH VEGETABLES, INC. <br /> WILD ROSE VINEYARDS, LLC <br /> FORMER VICTOR FRUIT FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Introduction <br /> Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc. (Dole) and Wild Rose Vineyards LLC (Wild Rose) (jointly Dischargers) <br /> have failed to comply with Cleanup and Abatement Order(CAO)No. R5-2004-0714 and failed to <br /> close the wastewater ponds at the former Victor Fruit Facility. Dole operated the facility to process <br /> cherries and discharged process wastewater to unlined ponds. Soil under the ponds has been <br /> contaminated with sulfate to 3,400 mg/kg and chloride to 500 mg/kg as compared to background <br /> concentrations of 120 mg/kg and 22 mg/kg, respectively. Groundwater downgradient of the ponds <br /> has been impacted with elevated concentrations of TDS, sulfate, and nitrate. Dole sold the property, <br /> including the unclosed ponds, to Wild Rose in 1999. As part of the sale agreement,Dole agreed to <br /> resolve any environment issues resulting from the cherry processing operation and in 2002 Dole <br /> submitted a plan to close the ponds. The closure plan called for closing the ponds as a landfill, <br /> cleanup of groundwater contamination, and a deed restriction limiting future use of the site. Staff <br /> approved Dole's plan in March 2002. Wild Rose subsequently objected to the deed restriction and <br /> denied access to Dole for the purpose of closing the ponds. <br /> In August 2004, the Executive Officer issued the CAO to force Dole and Wild Rose to resolve their <br /> issues and close the ponds. The CAO required submittals leading to final closure of the ponds by <br /> 1 November 2004. In response to the CAO, Wild Rose submitted a counter plan to clean close the <br /> facility. Staff determined that Wild Rose's plan was incomplete and provided detailed comments for <br /> the necessary revisions. In early November 2004, staff understood that Wild Rose and Dole had <br /> entered into negotiations to work together and close the ponds. However, despite these apparent <br /> efforts to resolve issues, the parties have been unable to agree on a closure plan and to comply with <br /> the CAO. <br /> Historical Overview <br /> The former Victor Fruit Facility is a former cherry processing facility operated by Dole from 1982 to <br /> 1999. In 1999 the site was sold to Wild Rose. When the facility was active as a cherry processor, <br /> wash water and used brine solution were discharged to the six unlined evaporation/percolation ponds <br /> and this liquid waste was then used intermittently to irrigate the company-owned vineyards. <br /> From 1982 to 1992 the facility operated under WDRs Order No. 82-061, as a non-Chapter 15 facility. <br /> In 1992, the Regional Board adopted revised WDRs Order No. 92-154. The revised WDRs re- <br /> classified the wastes as a designated waste,under the criteria in Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 15, <br /> California Code of Regulations (Chapter 15)(now recodifred, in part, in Title 27 California Code of <br /> Regulations Division 2). The WDRs also required groundwater monitoring and the submittal of a <br /> technical report addressing wastewater treatment proposals. Ultimately,Dole treated the wastewater <br /> to reduce total dissolved solids concentrations(TDS) and was allowed to continue to discharge to the <br /> unlined ponds. Dole sold the property to Wild Rose in 1999; the wastewater ponds were operated by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.