Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT: CONSIDERi�rfON OF AN 2 <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABELITY ORDER FOR <br /> FORMER VICTOR FRUIT FACILITY <br /> California Fruit Processors LLC (a lessee of Wild Rose) for a single season in 2000. Dole has <br /> accepted responsibility for closing the ponds because of its long-term discharge to the ponds. <br /> In November 1999, Dole requested that the wastewater be re-classified as non-designated waste. In <br /> response, staff requested a soil investigation and discovered soil contamination of sulfate up to 3,400 <br /> mg/kg, and chloride up to 500 mg/kg. Background soil sulfate and chloride concentrations are <br /> approximately 120 mg/kg and 22 mg/kg, respectively. Groundwater down gradient of the ponds was <br /> impacted with elevated TDS, sulfate and nitrate. <br /> In January 2002, Dole submitted a closure plan for the ponds and in June 2002 Dole submitted an <br /> Engineering Feasibility Study to cleanup-impacted groundwater. Staff concurred on 29 August 2002 <br /> with Dole's revised Closure Plan and on 6 December 2002 with the plan to cleanup groundwater. <br /> Dole proposed to leave some contamination in place with a low permeability soil cover. In <br /> compliance with Title 27 closure requirements, a deed restriction prohibiting any modification to the <br /> drainage and cover would be placed on the footprint of the closed ponds. Wild Rose objects to the <br /> deed restriction and has refused to allow Dole on the property to close the ponds. On 5 August 2004, <br /> the Executive Officer issued CAO No. R5-2004-0714 requiring Dole Fresh Vegetables Inc. and Wild <br /> Rose Vineyards LLC to complete closure of the ponds by 1 November 2004. <br /> Recent Violations <br /> Recent violations of the CAO include the Dischargers' failure to submit a revised closure plan and to <br /> complete closure of the ponds by 1 November 2004. The CAO set compliance dates to: 1) submit a <br /> time schedule to implement Dole's accepted closure plan or submit a revised plan by 31 August 2004; <br /> 2) submit proof that a deed restriction had been filed by 17 September 2004; 3) submit a workplan to <br /> implement the approved corrective actions by 30 September 2004; and 4) complete closure <br /> construction by 1 November 2004. On 31 August 2004, Wild Rose submitted a schedule to clean <br /> close the wastewater ponds. Clean closure of the ponds would make the deed restriction unnecessary. <br /> On 29 October 2004, Wild Rose submitted a closure plan. Staff s review of the plan found it to be <br /> incomplete, and staff requested several revisions. A revised closure plan was submitted on 13 April <br /> 2005. Subsequently Wild Rose requested that the revised plan be put on hold.to allow further <br /> revisions. As of this date Wild Rose has not submitted a complete closure plan. Therefore, the <br /> Dischargers remain in non-compliance with items 2, 3, and 4 of the CAO. <br /> ACL Amount <br /> In determining the amount of any civil liability pursuant to CWC Section 13350,the Regional Board <br /> must take into account the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations, <br /> whether the discharge is susceptible to cleanup or abatement,the degree of toxicity of the discharge, <br /> and, with respect to the violator, the ability to pay,the effect on ability to continue in business, any <br /> voluntary cleanup efforts undertaken, any prior history of violations, the degree of culpability, <br /> economic savings, if any, resulting from the violation, and other matters as justice may require. <br />