Laserfiche WebLink
01 May 2007 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 07-1516 <br /> Page 35 of 39 <br /> t� <br /> indications,such as chemical storage or dumping,spilled powders,Ai�secdored or staine-d soil, <br /> or stressed vegetation, that the property has been significantly'adverselyimpacted by <br /> agricultural chemicals. AGE notes that the property formerly stored and used agricultural <br /> chemicals, but the buildings and storage areas were removed by the time of the site <br /> reconnais <br /> • <br /> Ine,1,000-gallon US (unleaded gasoline) was removed 6om the site in November 1992 <br /> hout SJCEHD-pe Its.In May 1993 confirmation sampling was performed by Geological <br /> "e approximately 16' x 8' x 8'tank pit; two samples were collected from the tank <br /> pit and one from the stockpile. The samples were analyzed for benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes(BTEX),Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPH-g) <br /> and Total Lead.The results of the analyses inferred non-detect for BTEX and TPH-g and low <br /> levels of lead (11 - 15 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)) where the detection level was 1 <br /> mg/kg.This UST location appears to have been south from the former airplane parking strip. <br /> A closure letter from the SJCEHD for this UST removal was issued on 21 December 1993. <br /> • With the 1990 issuance of Monitoring and Reporting Program (M&RP) Order #90-810, <br /> Cleanup and Abatement Orders#87-734 and 89-705 were rescinded by the CVRWQCB;no / <br /> soil cleanup was require,"t that ' e. <br /> • Property use�ncludedja residence and trailer that appeared to have utilized an in-ground <br /> 'septic system;'septic systems provide the potential of trespass to the subsurface; AGE has / <br /> no direct evidence-that a trespass has occurred. <br /> • The lack of asbesto survey for the subject property hangar. The age of the hangar might <br /> indicate that a urve e performed,but as noted from the site reconnaissance, the building <br /> was of metal construction with a dirt floor; no items of possible asbestos-containing <br /> materials were noted. <br /> Recognized Environmental Conditions <br /> This assessment has revealed the following recognized environmental conditions (RE <br /> connection with the property: <br /> • As noted from the property history and the Interview,the property has been utilized as a crop <br /> dusting service for over 50 years, with former and possibly long-term storage and use of <br /> agricultural chemicals,farffier fueling operations,the potential of spillage when the airplanes <br /> were loaded and the storage of scrap metals for at least four years. <br /> • Site investigations have been performed on the subject property with reference to a wash <br /> water discharge area and chemical storage areas since 1985. Cleanup and Abatement Orders <br /> were issued by the CVRWQCB in 1987 and 1989 to ensure further property assessment. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />