Laserfiche WebLink
c <br /> Davi. Avila <br /> 903 El Vecfho Ave. <br /> Modesto, CA 95350 <br /> April 26, 2002 <br /> Gp <br /> Public Health Services Cr <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Attention: Ray Borges <br /> Subject: Lima Ranch Nitrate Loading/Soil Suitability Study <br /> Revised April 19, 2002 <br /> Ray: <br /> In response to your comments in our telephone conversations, <br /> • Where's Appendix II? <br /> I'm sorry about the confusion between Appendix Roman numerals II and Ii. Future reports will <br /> use a numbering system that avoids this. <br /> • Page 16—Nitrate in well water <br /> The following sentences will replace the last paragraph on page 16: <br /> The water quality changes significantly in the general area, reference appendix MG & Mi. <br /> Coliform was present at the well at 13151 Neeley Rd. Nitrate was above limit in all wells except one. <br /> Based only on the test results from these five wells and the fact that we are not sure from what depths <br /> or from what aquifer water samples have been pumped from, it can only be concluded that the <br /> groundwater nitrate levels in the general area are impacted . <br /> • Page 18—Impact to Underlying Groundwater and Downgradient Wells <br /> The following will replace the last 3 paragraphs on page 18: <br /> The presence of nitrate in the ground water indicates that there may be some agricultural <br /> contribution. Furthermore, the consistent level of nitrate in the ground water indicates that the <br />