Laserfiche WebLink
gas station. The Combination Gas Station is a permitted use in the C-FS zone, with Site <br /> Approval. (DEIR, p.7-11.) <br /> 2. Analysis of Alternative 3's Ability to Reduce Sienificaut Project Impacts <br /> Adoption of Alternative 3 would not avoid the Project's significant and unavoidable impacts. <br /> Transportation <br /> The Kimley-Horn traffic analysis calculated vehicle trips for a gas station with convenience <br /> market,based on a trip generation figure provided by Trip Generation, 8th Edition,published by <br /> the Institute of Transportation Engineers.This alternative land use would generate approximately <br /> 1,954 trips, which is approximately 57% less than the 4,532 trips used to evaluate air quality <br /> impacts of the proposed Project. <br /> Given the reduced vehicle trips, impacts on the intersections and freeway ramp junctions would <br /> be reduced. As with the Reduced Project Size alternative, it is expected that intersections <br /> operating at LOS D with the proposed Project under cumulative conditions would likely operate <br /> at a minimally acceptable LOS C under this alternative. As indicated in the Project traffic <br /> analysis, however, LOS D and LOS F occurred under cumulative conditions with the proposed <br /> Project at the SR 12/North Thornton Road intersection during AM and PM peak hours, <br /> respectively. For the proposed Project,a mitigation measure requiring signal coordination at the <br /> three intersections studied in the traffic analysis was recommended. This same mitigation would <br /> apply under this alternative. Freeway ramp junctions would continue to operate at LOS D under <br /> both existing and cumulative conditions under this alternative and this alternative would <br /> contribute traffic to these unacceptable LOS. As any contribution of traffic to the ramp junctions <br /> operating at LOS D would be a significant impact, and because no feasible mitigation is <br /> available, as is the case for the proposed Project, the ramp junction impacts for this alternative <br /> would be significant and unavoidable under both existing and cumulative conditions. The <br /> potential elimination of heavy-duty truck traffic, however, may have a more positive effect on <br /> this issue. As such, though traffic generation may be reduced under this alternative, impacts <br /> under this alternative would be similar to those of the proposed Project.(DEM p.7-11.) <br /> Air Quality <br /> Reduction in traffic volumes would also reduce the amounts of air pollutant emissions that would <br /> be generated, particularly NOx emissions. ROG, NOx and PM10 emissions under this <br /> alternative would be below the SJVAPCD significance thresholds. In addition, due to <br /> elimination of service for heavy-duty trucks, diesel particulate matter emissions would be <br /> reduced,thereby reducing the potential health risks associated with these emissions. (DEM p. <br /> 7-11.) <br /> 3. Feasibility of Alternative 3 <br /> The Combination Gasoline Station alternative would result in a reduction in environmental <br /> effects associated with air quality and traffic impacts as compared to the proposed Project This <br /> alternative would generate the least traffic among all the alternatives considered in detail and is <br /> Love's Travel Stops Environmental Impact Report to Findings of Facttind <br /> Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />