My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005291 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TINNIN
>
23480
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500507
>
SU0005291 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:36 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:39:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0005291
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500507
STREET_NUMBER
23480
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
TINNIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
22611032
ENTERED_DATE
8/10/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
23480 S TINNIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/9/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\TINNIN\23480\PA-0500507\SU0005291\SS STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
✓✓ (§,4.2 a*t1fituttra <br /> Water analysis reveals a very high nitrate (as nitrate -NO3) concentrationo 12 <br /> ppm forHomesite Parcel domestic well. Dibromochloropropane (DBCP), and <br /> Dibromide(EDB) were found to be Below Detectable Levels (BDL). The Maximum Contaminant <br /> Level(MCL) for nitrate in drinking water is 45 ppm. This nitrate concentration originated from <br /> surrounding agricultural inputs and production. Since: 1.) The groundwater is shallow, and 2.) <br /> Surrounding agricultural production land density is high, nitrate impact from the new Chavez <br /> residence could be attenuated as much as possible by installing the leachlines as high in elevation <br /> as possible. <br /> (§ 7.0) CONCLUSIONS <br /> The perc test results for proposed Parcel 1 and the Designated Remainder show acceptable <br /> percolation for the management of anticipated septic system effluent flows. As noted from the <br /> shallow tests indicative of leachline trenches, effluent percolation will readily occur at the leachline <br /> depth. However, when the soil becomes saturated,percolation will be retarded, as was evidenced <br /> by the percolation tests for the future disposal area for the Chavez residence. <br /> EHD requires that there be sufficient distance for"treatment"of septic effluent before it encounters <br /> the groundwater table. This distance is normally regarded to be five feet in leachlines and 10 feet <br /> with seepage pits. Therefore, sufficient distance exists between the bottom of a maximum depth <br /> leachline at 42 inches and the current groundwater depth of 15 feet(180 inches - 42 inches = 138 <br /> inches, or 11.5 feet). <br /> //(Q6.8) he number of leachlines, and septic tank size will be determined at the time the septic <br /> cr applies for the permit. It is my understanding the new Chavez residence will have four <br /> bedrooms. <br /> Z� No problems are anticipated for the future septic system on the property, other than typical <br /> lifespan concerns. An engineered septic system will not have to be installed for the Chavez home, <br /> unless there are continual failures for an unforeseen reason. The new system must have a 50% <br /> standby replacement area incorporated into the area of the disposal field. This will be easily <br /> accomplished since the area surrounding the proposed disposal area is an almond orchard. All <br /> related septic system structures and the new domestic well must comply with the published <br /> "distance" requirements from property borders, roads, irrigation fields and structures. <br /> It is important to recognize that all septic systems have a lifespan, which is dependant on several <br /> factors and is therefore difficult to determine. Septic system leachline failure would primarily <br /> result from the advanced formation of a"biomat" or"clogging mat" on the wetted soil/effluent <br /> interface. This mat is composed mostly of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and bacterial products <br /> consisting of a slime of polyuronides and polysaccharides. If the soil/effluent interface is well <br /> aerated, a variety of soil microfauna such as nematodes and protozoa may digest the clogging mat <br /> bacteria. <br /> Page -4- jj <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.