Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br /> Biological Resources, MONK &ASSOCIATFS <br /> Impacts and Mitigations <br /> Tracy Facility Expansion Site <br /> reclamation of the project site after mining in completed,would reduce impacts to nesting <br /> California homedlarks to a Ieve1 considered less than <br /> significant..ificant. <br /> r 8- San Joaquin Pocket Mouse <br /> 14:15 Impact Numbe <br /> Implementation of the project as proposed could result in impacts to the San.Joaquin <br /> pocket mouse. <br /> Joaquin pocket mouse is a Federal species of concern and a State species of special <br /> The San a impacted b the <br /> or this species would b p y <br /> e habitat f <br /> acres <br /> of suitable sP <br /> concern. Approximately 137 project include direct <br /> is to this mouse from the p <br /> potential impacts Pote <br /> project as currently proposed, P <br /> loss of individuals by heavy equipment and indirect.temporary impacts(i.e., one to six years) <br /> that would include loss of foraging and burrowing habitat. At this time it is not known whether <br /> or not the San Jo uin ocket mouse is resent on the project site. In the absence of survey <br /> results confirming or negating the presence of San Joaquin pocket mouse on the project site; it <br /> must be concluded that impacts to this species from the proposed project are potentially <br /> significant. However,mitigation could be implemented that would reduce this impact to a level <br /> considered less than significant. <br /> 14.16 Mitigation Measure 8� San Joaquin Pocket Mouse . <br /> Implementation.of the following mitigation`should offset impacts to the San Joaquin packet <br /> mouse to a level considered less than significant. <br /> Because Granite will be required to mitigate for impacts to San Joaquin kit fox, and since <br /> provision of a kit fox mitigation site would also mitigate any potential impacts to San Joaquin <br /> pocket mouse, a trapping survey to determine the presence or absence of this species within the <br /> project site should not be conducted. Rather, a preconstruction trapping and removal.effort <br /> would be conducted in each excavation area to avoid`.`taking" San Joaquin pocket mouse. This <br /> trapping removal effort should be completed no more than 30 days prior to mining in the current <br /> excavation area(Area 1;2, 3, etc.). If this mouse species is captured,mitigation would include <br /> removing trapped animals to nearby suitable habitats. In addition to trapping animals, one-way <br /> eviction boxes should be placed over active burrows. This trapping and relocation effort should <br /> be coordinated with USFWS and CDFG and should only be completed by a qualified wildlife <br /> biologist. Trapping and removal of the San Joaquin pocket mouse and acquisition of mitigation <br /> land would reduce impacts to less than significant. <br /> 14.17 Impact Number 9-American Badger <br /> Implementation of the project as proposed could result in impacts to the American badger. <br /> The American badger is a State species of special concern. It has no Federal status. <br /> Approximately 137 acres of suitable American badger denning and foraging habitat would be <br /> impacted by the project as proposed. Potential impacts to individual badgers during excavation <br /> include: accidental entrapment in burrows and encounters with heavy equipment. Temporary <br /> 35 <br />