Laserfiche WebLink
Wastewater Treatment System FALL CREEK <br /> Engineering Report ENGINEERING,INC. <br /> 3. DESIGN CRITERIA AND CALCULATIONS—CURRENT EXPANSION <br /> The proposed design for the treatment system includes a hyperbolic screen for removing coarse <br /> solids, a dual chambered septic tank for settling, and a sub-surface flow vegetated wetland. This <br /> treatment system will reduce concentrations of BOD, suspended solids, and dissolved solids and <br /> will help neutralize pH. Following treatment and BOD reduction the treated water will be <br /> applied to a vegetated slow-rate land disposal system. The wastewater treatment wetland has <br /> %W been designed to remove biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in the Winery's process <br /> ,,, wastewater by at least 95% based on design flows of 1,660 gallons per day, organic loading of <br /> 69 lbs/day, and a surface loading rate of 160 lbs BOD/ac-day. <br /> The following design criteria were used in designing the treatment system: <br /> (1) Parabolic Screen. A parabolic screen will be used at the beginning of the treatment train <br /> to remove coarse solids from the process wastewater. <br /> (2) Septic Tank. Screened wastewater will flow via gravity to a new 5,000-gallon septic <br /> tank. The tank will be used for wastewater stabilization and limited anaerobic digestion. <br /> From the septic tank, wastewater would flow through a distribution manifold and through <br /> the wetland itself. <br /> `, (3) Monthly Water Balance. Monthly water balance calculations were performed on the <br /> %0 proposed wetland to determine the feasibility of the treatment system. <br /> (4) Organic Loading Rates. The EPA recommends a constructed wetland mass loading rate <br /> �r of approximately 112-kg BOD5/ha-d (100 lbs BOD/ac-day) (USEPA, 1988). However, <br /> experimental studies have shown that BOD loading rates of up to 8 times this <br /> recommended value (1640 kg BOD5/ha-a or 1464 lbs BOD/ac-day) have produced <br /> significant organic reductions in winery wastewater(Shepherd et al, 2001). Results of <br /> �- that study also found that despite fluctuation in inlet wastewater strength, the outlet water <br /> quality was generally consistent and occasional excessive organic loading did not <br /> interfere with treatment. <br /> (5) Hydraulic Detention Time. It is generally expected that a wetland detention time of at <br /> least 6-7 days is optimal and that any shorter than that will not provide adequate <br /> treatment. <br /> (6) Stormwater Detention. The treatment system will have a secondary benefit of its ability <br /> to hydraulically dampen flow variations. The wastewater system at the Winery facility <br /> receives both process wastewater and stormwater; therefore the system has to be able to <br /> handle both flow types. The wetland was designed to contain and treat runoff volume <br /> resulting from the 100-year 24-hour storm flow. <br /> (7) Land Application. After treatment, process wastewater and stormwater will be applied to <br /> _ landscaped areas at the winery using solid set sprinkler irrigation. <br /> .IESSIE's GROW WINERY MAY 2002 <br /> 8 <br />