Laserfiche WebLink
v <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Based upon the percolation test results, interviews and <br /> soil type, it is my opinion that the subject property <br /> is suitable for septic tank and leach field , and that <br /> the use of the septic system should not degrade the <br /> existing groundwater at the density proposed . I also <br /> recommend that 8,000 S.F . be retained for leach field <br /> for Parcel 2 and 10, 000 S.F . be retained for leach <br /> field for Parcel 1 . The somewhat slower percolation <br /> rate for Parcel 1 was probably due to the saturated <br /> condition from irrigating . <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the <br /> information provided regarding the existing and <br /> proposed development , and on the site conditions as <br /> they existed at the time we performed the percolation <br /> test . It was assumed that the test hole and <br /> percolation test results are representative of an <br /> average of the subsurface conditions in the general <br /> area . <br /> Our professional services were performed , our findings <br /> obtained , and our conclusions proposed , in accordance <br /> with generally accepted engineering principles and <br /> practices . This warranty is in lieu of all other <br /> warranties, either expressed , or implied . Test <br /> findings and statements of professional opinion do not <br /> constitute a guarantee or warranty , expressed or <br /> implied . <br /> Since ,ely , �;y� ROF N <br /> E. <br /> No.42764 rn <br /> m <br /> STEVEN E. PECHIN, President DATED Exp.3.31-85 <br /> Civil Engineer No. 42?64 .P <br /> v. C10. <br />