Laserfiche WebLink
Fof <br /> of Alkalinity Requirement for Nitrification <br /> rate-nitrogen loading calculations above are contingent upon the environmental factorsitrification to occur. These conditions include soil pore-space oxygen content, soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and alkalinity. <br /> wastewater effluent is derived from the domestic water supply in addition to the <br /> introduction of wastes. As referenced,nitrification consumes approximately 7.1 mg of alkalinity for <br /> every mg of ammonia-nitrogen(NH;N) oxidized. Although the effluent sampled from the three / <br /> Churches all exhibited high alkalinity, domestic well water from deeper aquifers generally has a <br /> much lower alkalinity than shallower groundwater. <br /> Nitrification of the average Total Nitrogen concentration87 mg/L obtained from the three <br /> Church samples referenced in the Primary Report on Page would require: 87 mg/L NH4 N x 7.1 <br /> mg CaCO3=618 mg/L alkalinity. As noted in Table 11 of the Primary Report, the average <br /> alkalinity was 563 mg/L, which may be slightly insufficient. Comparing the alkalinity of the water <br /> table groundwater under the future disposal field at 293 mg/L and assuming the future domestic <br /> well water will have an alkalinity of approximately 120 mg/L, it may be that nitrification will be <br /> inhibited if the Total Nitrogen concentration from the Multipurpose Building is similar to the three <br /> sampled Churches. <br /> Mounding Analysis <br /> Since the groundwater was determined to be 57.5 feet below existing grade in the 2003 drilling <br /> investigation, mounding potential should be nonexistent and inconsequential. Additionally, since a <br /> gravel stratum was encountered in the two backhoe test pits at eight feet below grade, this also <br /> would in all likelihood prevent the formation of the mound phenomenon under the disposal area. <br /> E. SURFACE WATER INFORMATION <br /> One drainage retention basin for Phase I is to be located 90 feet north-northeast of the future <br /> disposal area, with another basin 600 feet southeast of the disposal area. The 100%Reserve/ <br /> Replacement Disposal Area, is to be adjacent to the south of the Primary Disposal Area. The <br /> surface water retention pond for the complete development of the project will be at the northeast <br /> corner of the subject property. There should be no impact to impoundment water from the proposed <br /> filter bed due to the separation distances. Depending on the directional flow upper groundwater <br /> aquifers, which likely follows the terrain of the land surface,places the retention basin <br /> downgradient to the future filter bed. Regardless of the precise groundwater directional flow, <br /> percolating rainwater from the basin into the top aquifer mixing layer may create a dilution effect to <br /> the percolating septic system effluent. However,this can only be truly discerned with complicated <br /> groundwater monitoring and modeling. According to a scientific paper authored by Shaw and <br /> Turyk(See References), reduction of nitrate concentrations in groundwater can occur primarily <br /> through dispersion, or by percolating rainwater recharge. <br /> CliTData amfall vers s Evapotranspiration <br /> NL9§3.2 The(Primary Repo for this project discusses in detail, applicable climatic data since the <br /> original aste ter disposal esign was to take advantage of evapotranspiration. While the design <br /> criteria for the tipurpo Building expressed in this report is partially dependant upon <br /> evapotranspiration, t e ata in the Primary Report discusses its beneficial aspects. <br /> Page -8- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />