My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0005250
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0500462
>
SU0005250
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:34 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:57:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0005250
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0500462
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911031& 32
ENTERED_DATE
7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/25/2005 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\V\VIA NICOLO\17950\PA-0500462\SU0005250\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RUG--18-2005 05 :54 AM P. 03 <br /> J <br /> CIWMB California Environmental Quality Act Review <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance is required for the establishment, <br /> expansion, or change in operation(s) of a Solid Waste f=acility (SWF) requiring the issuance or <br /> revision of a full Solid Waste Facility, Permit (SWFP). <br /> Under CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15095, the CIWMB acting as a Responsible Agency, is <br /> required to use the environmental document (ED) prepared by the Lead Agency in the CIWMB <br /> permit approval or concurrence process. Once the ED is completed by the Lead Agency, <br /> CIWMB staff, as a Responsible Agency, must determine whether or not the evaluation of <br /> potential environmental impacts assessed in the ED Is adequate for CIWMB use in the <br /> permitting process. <br /> The purpose of CIWMB staffs review of an ED, during the preparation of the document, is to <br /> help decision-makers 1) identify potential impacts from proposed projects, 2) determine whether <br /> any such impacts are significant, and 3) ascertain whether significant impacts can be mitigated <br /> to a level of insignificance in compliance with the CEQA statutes and guidelines. In order for <br /> CIWMB staff to ascertain that the ED is adequate for our use in the permitting process, the <br /> proposed project must be described in sufficient detail and the potential environmental Impacts <br /> that may result from the proposed project must be identified and evaluated clearly in the <br /> environmental assessment and offer"mitigating measures, if any, included in the project to <br /> avoid potentially significant effects" (CEQA Guidelines, Article B, Section 15071[e]). <br /> If the Lead Agency identifies a potential significant environmental impact but finds that the <br /> E impact is less than significant or that no mitigation is available or necessary, supporting <br /> documentation and/or studies should be specifically referenced and be made available for <br /> review or included in the ED to support such analysis. <br /> CEQA Analysis and SWFP Conditions <br /> CEQA Guidelines (CCR) Section 15063(a)(1) states that: "All phases of project planning, . <br /> i implementation and operation must be considered in the Initial Study of the project. "This <br /> consideration, when evaluating for a SWFP revision, should consider the potential <br /> i environmental impacts of any changes in design and operation of the facility that were not <br /> specifically considered in the existing SWAP. <br /> I <br /> When determining the adequacy of an ED for purposes of SWFP concurrence, ClWMB staff will <br /> compare the design and operation of the facility as described in the SWI*P with the project as <br /> i described and evaluated in the ED. The first question is: does the CEQA evaluation for <br /> potential Impacts resulting from the project thoroughly assess the potential primary and <br /> secondary impacts to the environment and/or public health and safety? The second question is: <br /> does the CEQA evaluation in the ED support the conditions of the proposed permit? For <br /> instance, does the ED also assess the potential traffic, noise, dust, vector and other impacts <br /> that can be associated with a significant increase in permitted waste throughput requested in a <br /> SWFP? When this type of information Is included and addressed in the ED, the CEQA process <br /> is greatly facilitated, When this type of information is not included in the project description or <br /> elsewhere in the'ED, it becomes very difficult for CIWMB staff to determine the adequacy of the <br /> ED for purposes.of our environmental evaluation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.