Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> STAFF REPORT,Item 15 <br /> CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AND CWC 13308 ORDER <br /> MUSCO OLIVE PRODUCTS AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> opportunity to discuss the ACLC with the Executive Officer or request the matter to be heard by the <br /> Board. <br /> The proposed C&D Order has a number of requirements, each of which are described below. <br /> The Discharger must modify its facility or limit production such that it meets the 500,000 gpd flow limit, <br /> the BOD loading limit, and the DIS loading limit contained in the WDRs. For each item, each day of <br /> violation after 10 February 2002 will result in a penalty of$2,500 per day. This requirement is necessary <br /> to bring the Discharger into compliance with its WDRs, and may result in the Discharger reducing <br /> production, addressing source control measures, and/or constructing additional Title 27 impoundments. <br /> Staff realize that this is an economic burden,but the Discharger has been on notice since May 2000 that <br /> it needs substantial improvements or operational changes to comply with its WDRs, yet the Discharger <br /> has not made the improvements and has continued to aggressively expand its processing capability. <br /> Staff also directed the Discharger in the May 2000 Water Code Section 13267 letter to review <br /> alternatives for source control procedures at the facility. It is unknown whether the Discharger has <br /> pursued this option. <br /> The proposed C&D Order requires Musco to submit a groundwater monitoring well installation <br /> workplan and three months later, a groundwater monitoring well report of results. This requirement is a <br /> result of the limited hydrogeologic study that was completed as part of the C&A. The study showed that <br /> that groundwater depths are shallower than previously known and that the aquifer material is thicker <br /> than previously expected. Therefore, Musco needs to show whether or not the application of saline <br /> wastewater to land is impacting the underlying groundwater. The C&D states that there will be a S2,500 <br /> penalty for each day in which these two reports are late or incomplete. <br /> The proposed C&D Order also requires that Musco evaluate its domestic wastewater system, which <br /> consists of septic tanks, leachlines, and seepage pits. The Discharger stated during the 2 November 2001 <br /> inspection that approximately 350 employees work at the facility, yet the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department's October 2001 records show that the system is designed for only 164 <br /> employees. In addition, the Discharger has recently begun spraying its industrial wastewater to land <br /> directly over the leachlines and seepage pits. Therefore,the domestic system needs to be evaluated for <br /> two reasons: whether it can adequately treat the flows it receives, and whether the application of <br /> industrial wastewater is compromising the ability to treat and dispose of domestic waste. The C&D <br /> states that there will be a$2,500 penalty for each day in which this report is late or incomplete. <br /> Musco will also be required to submit monthly status reports describing all work completed in response <br /> to the C&D Order. These reports shall also contain daily tabulations of flow rates, BOD loading rates, <br /> and DIS loading rates. There will be a $2,500 penalty for each day a report is incomplete or late. <br /> Finally, the Discharger must submit a report by 1 July 2002, showing how it has modified its facility so <br /> that it is in full compliance with WDRs No. 97-037 and C&A Order No. 5-00-717. If full compliance is <br /> not achieved by this date, then within ten days of written notification by the Executive Officer, the <br /> Discharger must immediately cease the discharge of all wastewater, including the land application areas <br /> and the Class 11 ponds. The 1 July 2002 compliance date gives the Discharger an extra eight months to <br />