Laserfiche WebLink
y KLEINFELDER <br /> scored, and significant loose material was removed from the bottom of the hole. The <br /> percolation tests were then prepared by first placing about 2 inches of fine gravel at <br /> the bottom of the holes and installing a 4-inch diameter, perforated PVC pipe. Before <br /> noon on July 21, 2005, about 12 inches of water was placed in the holes for pre- <br /> soaking. On July 22, 2005, the percolation tests were started at about 8:30 AM on <br /> July 22, 2005, in accordance with SJCEHD accepted guidelines, using clear potable <br /> water. None of the holes exhibited sloughing or caving. The holes were empty of <br /> water prior to testing. From a fixed reference point (a marked location on the side of <br /> PVC pipe), the drop in water level was measured in approximate 30-minute intervals <br /> for four hours, refilling as necessary to maintain the prescribed amount of water over <br /> the gravel (SJCEHD Procedure #2). Under the observation of a representative from <br /> the SJCEHD, the last 30-minute reading of the four-hour period was used to calculate '�e <br /> the percolation rate in minutes per inch. Because the permit does not allow three <br /> percolations to be performed, the SJCEHD representative only approved the test <br /> _ results for percolation test holes P-1 and P-3. Copies of our field percolation test <br /> ��,� <br /> results are attached (Plates 7 and 8). Additional details regarding each test can be <br /> found on the attached percolation test sheets. <br /> On July 26, 2005, samples of groundwater were obtained using clean procedures from <br /> a spigot at the head of the domestic well located near the existing residence. A permit <br /> for the well was not on file with SJCEHD. The water samples obtained from the well tt <br /> were delivered to a laboratory on ice that same day using chain-of-custody procedures �`f5�Jit b7 <br /> for DBCP and nitrate (N) testing. �r� <br /> The boring and percolation test holes were located in the field by visual sighting and/or <br /> pacing from existing site features; therefore, the locations shown on Plate 2 should be <br /> considered approximate. <br /> 6. GROUNDWATER <br /> Groundwater was not encountered in the soil profile boring drilled for this investigation. <br /> Lines of Equal Depth to Groundwater contour maps published in groundwater reports <br /> by the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (1981 to <br /> Z I� 1999) show groundwater levels in the project area ranging from about 45 to 70 feet <br /> below ground surface. Based on Lines of Equal Elevation of Groundwater contour <br /> maps, the groundwater gradient in the project area is generally from Northwest to <br /> Southeast. Local gradient variations may occur due to well usage. <br /> We understand that the existing well on the property will be used to supply water for <br /> the new facility. No new wells are planned. We anticipate that the predominant use of <br /> _ groundwater will be for public and landscaping purposes. <br /> The results of the groundwater analysis to determine the concentrations of nitrate (N) ! <br /> in the water sampled from the on-site well indicated a concentration of 0.23 mg/l. <br /> 59149.G011ST05R1062 August 30,2005 <br /> ` Copyright 2005 Kleinfelder,Inc. Page 3 of 7 <br />