My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:41:30 AM
Creation date
9/25/2019 4:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1599
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.1 AIR QUALITY <br /> Preconstruction Monitoring <br /> To ensure that the impacts from the LEC will not cause or contribute to a violation of an <br /> ambient air quality standard or an exceedance of a PSD increment,an analysis of the existing <br /> air quality in the project area is necessary. If a source is subject to PSD review,PSD regulations <br /> generally require preconstruction ambient air quality monitoring data for the purposes of <br /> establishing background pollutant concentrations in the impact area (40 CFR 52.21(m)). <br /> However,a facility may be exempted from this requirement if the predicted air quality <br /> impacts of the facility do not exceed the de minimis levels. Modeled impacts from the LEC <br /> are compared with the de minimis levels in Table 5.1-39. Since modeled impacts are below <br /> the de minimis levels,the project may be exempted from the requirement. <br /> TABLE 5.1-39 <br /> PSD Preconstruction Monitoring Exemption Levels <br /> Maximum Modeled Exceed Monitoring <br /> Pollutant Averaging Period Concentration De minimis Level Threshold? <br /> NO2 annual 0.26 Ng/m3 14 Pg/m3 No <br /> CO 8-hour average 111 Ng/m3 575 tag/m3 No <br /> The purpose of the preconstruction monitoring requirement is to verify that background <br /> concentrations are adequately characterized to ensure that the national ambient air quality <br /> standards are protected.With EPA's approval, a facility may rely on air quality monitoring <br /> data collected at District monitoring stations to satisfy the requirement for preconstruction <br /> monitoring. In such a case, in accordance with Section 2.4 of the EPA PSD guideline,the last <br /> 3 years of ambient monitoring data may be used if they are representative of the area's air <br /> quality where the maximum impacts occur due to the proposed source. <br /> The background data need not be collected on site,as long as the data are representative of <br /> the air quality in the subject area (40 CFR 51,Appendix W,Section 9.2). Three criteria are <br /> applied in determining whether the background data are representative: (1) location, (2) data <br /> quality,and (3) data currentness.29 These criteria are defined as follows: <br /> Location:The measured data must be representative of the areas where the maximum <br /> concentration occurs for the proposed stationary source,existing sources, and a combination <br /> of the proposed and existing sources. <br /> Data quality:Data must be collected and equipment must be operated in accordance with <br /> the requirements of 40 CFR Part 58,Appendices A and B,and PSD monitoring guidance. <br /> Currentness:The data are current if they have been collected within the preceding 3 years <br /> and they are representative of existing conditions. <br /> All of the data used in this analysis meet the requirements of Appendices A and B of 40 CFR <br /> Part 58, and thus all meet the criterion for data quality. All of the data have been collected <br /> within the preceding 3 years, and thus all meet the criterion for currentness.The location and <br /> overall representativeness of the data are discussed further below. <br /> 29 Ambient Monitoring Guidelines for Prevention of Significant Deterioration(PSD), EPA, 1987. <br /> SAC/371322/082410013(LEC_5.1_AIR_QUALITY.DOC) 5.1-59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.