Laserfiche WebLink
5.1 AIR QUALITY <br /> Data from the Hazelton Avenue monitoring station in Stockton, about 12 miles from the <br /> project site,were used to characterize CO and NO2 air quality at the project site. This station <br /> was chosen because of its proximity to the site and because data recorded there represent <br /> area-wide ambient conditions rather than the localized impacts of any particular facility. <br /> Because of the proximity of the monitoring station to the project,the data measured there are <br /> believed to be representative of the areas where the maximum project impacts will occur. <br /> Further, since ambient CO concentrations are generally driven by motor vehicle emissions <br /> and tend to be localized, the use of CO background data collected at Hazelton Avenue, <br /> which is in central Stockton near the Interstate 99 freeway, is expected to overpredict CO <br /> concentrations in the areas where the proposed project would have significant impacts. <br /> PSD Increment Consumption <br /> The maximum modeled impacts from the LEC facility are compared with the NO2 and CO <br /> significant impact levels in Table 5.1-40. These comparisons show that the maximum <br /> modeled NO2 and CO impacts from the proposed project do not exceed the SILs. Therefore, <br /> no increments analysis is required for the proposed project. <br /> TABLE 5.1-40 <br /> PSD Significant Impact Levels(SILs)and Class II Increments <br /> Maximum Modeled <br /> Pollutant Averaging Time Concentration SILsa Exceeds SIL? <br /> NO2 Annual 0.3 Pg/m3 1.0 Ng/m3 No <br /> CO 1-hour 324 Pg/m3 2000 Ng/m3 1-Hour <br /> 8-hour 111 Pg/m3 500 Pg/m3 8-Hour <br /> Air Quality Impacts Analysis <br /> Because the maximum modeled NO2 and CO impacts from the project are below the <br /> significance thresholds,no additional assessment of the impacts on ambient air quality are <br /> required under the PSD program requirements. However, a complete ambient air quality <br /> impacts analysis for NO2 and CO was provided in Section 5.1.5 above. The AQIA <br /> demonstrated that the project will not cause or contribute to any violations of federal <br /> standards for which PSD review applies. <br /> Impacts on Growth, Soils, Vegetation, and Sensitive Species <br /> PSD requirements include an assessment of the secondary impacts from projects subject to <br /> review. These potential secondary impacts include growth, soils and vegetation,and <br /> sensitive species. <br /> Growth <br /> There will be minimal growth associated with the proposed project during the construction <br /> phase, due to the relatively short 24-month construction schedule and the broad regional <br /> availability of construction labor in the southern Sacramento and northern San Joaquin <br /> Valleys. Further,no direct project-related long-term growth is expected to occur in the area <br /> because only 21 additional permanent employees will be added as a result of the new plant. <br /> 5.1-60 SAC/371322/082410013(LEC_5.1_AIR_QUALITY.DOC) <br />