My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
12751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516806
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2019 8:41:30 AM
Creation date
9/25/2019 4:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
LEC APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION
RECORD_ID
PR0516806
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012817
FACILITY_NAME
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTRO
STREET_NUMBER
12751
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95241
APN
05513016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
12751 N THORNTON RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1599
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> CEQA Appendix I is an environmental checklist that helps agencies determine if a project <br /> may have a significant impact on the environment. Under the heading"Biological <br /> Resources," the checklist poses questions as to whether a project will result in impacts to: <br /> • Endangered,threatened,or rare species or their habitats <br /> • Locally designated species (e.g.,heritage trees) <br /> • Locally designated natural communities <br /> • Wetland habitat <br /> • Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors <br /> Under the heading"Mandatory Findings of Significance," Appendix I asks if a project has <br /> the potential to do the following: <br /> • Degrade the quality of the environment that substantially reduces the habitat of a fish or <br /> wildlife species <br /> • Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels <br /> • Threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community <br /> • Reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal <br /> In the discussion of"Jeopardy" under the"Guidelines for Consulting with the Department <br /> of Fish and Game on Projects Subject to CEQA that may Affect Endangered and Threatened <br /> Species," the CDFG describes a"yes" answer to any of the following questions as a basis for <br /> an initial presumption that a threatened or endangered species would be jeopardized by a <br /> proposed project. <br /> • Would a viable or recoverable population be eliminated, or would a significant <br /> proportion of a population be adversely affected by the project or the project effects? <br /> • Would the range of the species be significantly diminished by the project? <br /> • Would habitat used by the species be reduced in quantity or quality by either the <br /> immediate or future effects of the project? <br /> • Would a species' access to its habitat be reduced or rendered more hazardous as a result <br /> of the project? <br /> • Would the project adversely affect current or future efforts at providing protection for <br /> the species? <br /> • Would plans for recovery and eventual delisting of the threatened or endangered <br /> species be adversely affected by the project? <br /> • Would the project interfere with reproductive or other behavior of the endangered or <br /> threatened species? <br /> • Would the project cause extinction of the species? <br /> SAC/371322/082330001(LEC_5.2_BIOLOGICAL_RESOURCES.DOC) 5.2-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.