Laserfiche WebLink
5.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> As per the latest CEC Rules of Practice and Procedure&Power Plant Site Certification <br /> Regulations (CEC,2007),in addition to the plant site and the construction laydown and/or <br /> parking area, a 200-foot minimum buffer was also surveyed for cultural resources around <br /> these facilities. In addition to the survey of the proposed gas line,a 50-foot minimum buffer <br /> was surveyed around the proposed gas line. <br /> The survey used linear pedestrian transects spaced at 10 meters and opportunistic <br /> examination of exposed soils to examine the survey areas to determine whether <br /> archaeological deposits might be present. Exposed soils,consisting mainly of previously <br /> disturbed agricultural sediments and road bed material,were inspected carefully,and no <br /> evidence of cultural materials was noted. <br /> Much of the visibility within the laydown and/or parking areas is impaired by thick <br /> vegetation. Some areas have poor visibility,less than 10 percent,therefore any areas with <br /> good visibility were surveyed even when they were outside of transects. The laydown area <br /> adjacent to the plant site has been graded and extensive earthmoving activities have <br /> resulted in the creation of a very large mound of dirt. Concrete pipe pieces have been <br /> dumped atop the mound. The eastern laydown area has been graded for parking and gravel <br /> has been put down.Additionally,several water lines daylight throughout the easternmost <br /> laydown area; eucalyptus trees are present in this area as well. All observed standpipes, <br /> waterlines, and spigots appear to be modern. The northernmost laydown area was not <br /> particularly disturbed and visibility was fair at approximately 50 percent. <br /> Visibility on the eastern end of the proposed gas line along West Armstrong Road was fair <br /> at approximately 50 percent.Visibility ranged from excellent along the dirt road south of the <br /> Lodi-Kingdon airstrip to poor within fallow agricultural fields between the 1-5 and the start <br /> of the paved road. The areas along the paved West Armstrong road are disturbed by two V <br /> ditches running adjacent to the road, grading for residences, a parking area for a small <br /> dairy, and grapevines. The areas along the dirt road are disturbed by both agricultural <br /> activities and grading for the dirt road. Underground water lines exist in the area; several <br /> were visible extending into V ditches adjacent to the dirt road. Several sections of ceramic <br /> water line have been pulled and dumped along the fields. All observed soils in the surveyed <br /> area range from medium to dark brown silty loam with some gravel and fist sized cobbles. <br /> The existing WPCF and STIG plant properties,previously used for agriculture,have been <br /> subjected to heavy disturbance since the construction of the WPCF in 1966 and the <br /> construction of the STIG plant in 1993 (Joe Bittner,2008,personal communication). Both <br /> excavation and grading occurred during the WPCF's initial construction in 1966. <br /> Excavations to a depth of six feet reportedly occurred during the construction of the STIG <br /> plant in the 1980's (Joe Bittner,2008,personal communication). An underground Pacific Gas <br /> and Electric (PG&E) line runs to the STIG plant,through the LEC project area and two of the <br /> laydown and/or parking areas,through the WPCF, and continues east. Areas surrounding <br /> the WPCF and STIG plant have been excavated to create reservoirs for the WPCF to the <br /> north and the San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector Control mosquito abatement ponds <br /> to the south. Extensive earthmoving activities were observed within the proposed project <br /> area during the survey as well. Additional disturbances include the current use of the <br /> proposed plant site as a temporary laydown area,modern trash related to the WPCF,and <br /> the dumping of modern concrete pipe fragments. Previously disturbed sediment would not <br /> have cultural material in context. Most cultural material would be destroyed by the <br /> SACI3713221082330008(LEC_5.3_CULTU RAL.DOC) 5.3-11 <br />