My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
23987
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544915
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:57:05 PM
Creation date
10/3/2019 8:11:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544915
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003884
FACILITY_NAME
GOLDEN EAGLE AVIATION INC
STREET_NUMBER
23987
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23987 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Sent: Friday, June 18,2010 4:07 PM <br /> To: 'tcuellar@advgeoenv.com' <br /> Subject: RE: Lodi Airport <br /> Tim, <br /> When I spoke to you on 15 June 2010 about the Lodi Airport site, I believe you told me that the responsible party <br /> had not received any money from the Clean Up Fund (CUF)and did not expect to get any money since the <br /> papers that the responsible party has submitted to the CUF have been denied. I thought you had indicated that <br /> the responsible party is not expecting to get reimbursement from the CUF and wants to excavate the soil and pay <br /> out of his own pocket. <br /> If the responsible party expects to be reimbursed from the CUF, then he must follow the CUF's guidance and <br /> must submit a cost analysis to show that excavation is the most cost effective method to remediate the Lodi <br /> Airport site. <br /> Vicki McCartney,Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton,California 95202 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Fax: (209)468-3433 <br /> Email: ymccartneya s'cehc.cum <br /> From: Tim Cuellar [mailto:tcuellar@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 2:19 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Lodi Airport <br /> Vicki, <br /> AGE recently had a meeting with Bob Kupka, and he has some concerns regarding your email below. <br /> Although he currently has no 'approved' claim with the tank fund, he has intentions of being reimbursed <br /> by the Clean Up Fund in the future. <br /> It is evident that the remaining shallow petroleum-impacted soil is the source for the soil-gas plume.You <br /> mentioned below that the EHD would approve an excavation plan, as long as the RP is not expecting to be <br /> reimbursed. Could you further elaborate why removing contaminated soil associated with the former <br /> UST system would not be a reimbursable cost? <br /> Thanks-Tim <br /> 6/18/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.